Taz
Journeyman Pro
Seems like the French are escorting them across now.
I don't know the answer and would be interested to know as well. My guess is they are put in detention centres and we then spend millions of pounds fighting the Cherie Blairs of this world to deport them. Money that could be spent on essential life saving services.A question for folks that may know. What happens to migrants who come across in boats? They get picked up by the authorities mid channel but we don't hear what happens to them after that. How many stay in the country, what percentage are removed? (in effect, is this method of entering ultimately a succesful one?)
I'm not looking for a right or wrong answer to whether migrants should come in, I'm looking for a practical answer.
That duty to save lives at Sea applies to the French Navy as much as the Royal Navy. If they find people in difficulties at sea they should rescue them, not escort them to someone else.Or maybe this more right wing BS, the French cannot force them back and will escort them until they are handed over to the Royal Navy.
We both have a duty to preserve life at Sea.
The French issue is that they should stop the boats from launching.
Escorting them to make sure they don’t get in to difficulty.That duty to save lives at Sea applies to the French Navy as much as the Royal Navy. If they find people in difficulties at sea they should rescue them, not escort them to someone else.
Why should the French care? Sounds harsh, but every illegal that lands on our shores is one less for them to deal with.It has long been suspected by those of us who deal with, or dealt with, this issue, that the French solution was to pass it on to someone else. This only reinforces that view.
No! They should rescue them to make sure they don't get into difficulty, they already were in a dangerous place. International maritime law expects ships to rescue anyone in danger on the sea.Escorting them to make sure they don’t get in to difficulty.
yes, its funny how the usual suspects who would question anything if it were in the Guardian...Maybe people should check the source(guido fawkes) rather than follow the right wing dog whistles.
Whether the source is correct or not your view that it is ok for the French not to rescue them is wrong.Maybe people should check the source(guido fawkes) rather than follow the right wing dog whistles.
Maybe they told the French Navy they weren’t in danger and didn’t need rescueing.No! They should rescue them to make sure they don't get into difficulty, they already were in a dangerous place. International maritime law expects ships to rescue anyone in danger on the sea.
https://international-review.icrc.org/articles/duty-rescue-sea-peacetime-and-war-general-overview
Who’s acting childish now? Were did I say that?Whether the source is correct or not your view that it is ok for the French not to rescue them is wrong.