Blue in Munich
Crocked Professional Yeti Impersonator
Doesn’t matter anymore - the house owner will always win if it went to court
So is that the golf course or the house owner that came first?
Doesn’t matter anymore - the house owner will always win if it went to court
C'mon, confess! It's downhill, right?There's aye someone.
That's not been legislated for but I think it should go into the category of "If it happens, let me know and if it happens again, we'll do something about it."
We are quality golfers. Our duffed shots make it to the penalty area 40 yards in front of the tees.
What scoundrel nicked my pipe?
Its use was banned under 1.2bWhat scoundrel nicked my pipe?
But that was only in the clubhouse vicinity, pro shop, practice greens and teeing areas.Its use was banned under 1.2b
Alignment device? (we had a member that used to use it for that)But that was only in the clubhouse vicinity, pro shop, practice greens and teeing areas.
So you have a habit of puffing furiously in the vicinity of your opponent's lost ball so he couldn't seeBut that was only in the clubhouse vicinity, pro shop, practice greens and teeing areas.
A South Manchester Club with a hole alongside the M62 restricts tee shots to irons only and another limits one tee to irons or rescue woods .There is no rule nor approved local rule prohibiting the use of a conforming club.
It's fine as a ball-marker though.Alignment device? (we had a member that used to use it for that)
Doesn’t matter anymore - the house owner will always win if it went to court
Is the correct answer. Someone recent purchased a house that backed into our 15th as they loved the view, a few stray balls into his garden and it was on the verge of going to court with the aim to get the hole shut down. The houses are mid 60’s so we’re after the course, the only reason we got to keep the hole was it was originally designed as a par4 and as such reducing it back to that length meant the house was out of play.
It’s completely ruined the hole, the club offered to cover the cost of a higher net style fence but he didn’t want to ruin the view over the course. The worst is the back garden is well over 120ft long and they the few that did land was in the scrubby bushes area right at the end ??
Is the correct answer. Someone recent purchased a house that backed into our 15th as they loved the view, a few stray balls into his garden and it was on the verge of going to court with the aim to get the hole shut down. The houses are mid 60’s so we’re after the course, the only reason we got to keep the hole was it was originally designed as a par4 and as such reducing it back to that length meant the house was out of play.
It’s completely ruined the hole, the club offered to cover the cost of a higher net style fence but he didn’t want to ruin the view over the course. The worst is the back garden is well over 120ft long and they the few that did land was in the scrubby bushes area right at the end ??
If the house owner refuses "reasonable remedies" they are changing the legal landscape. There is also nothing stopping the club planting some very fast growing and very large leylandii or similar inside their boundary to prevent balls going into the property.
I heard of one club in Wales having a similar issue and saying they were going to reroute the course and use the land for pig farming. Amazing how that changed the conversion. Applications for Social housing usually delights planners and upsets home owners like this too!
For me it’s simple, the house backs on to a golf course so expect balls in the garden.
For me it’s simple, the house backs on to a golf course so expect balls in the garden. The same happened a few years back with someone buying a house that backed onto brands hatch race circuit. They apparent “ under estimated “ the level of noise and restrictions were placed on the use of the full circuit.
Of course not. But, at the same time, you can't demand what vehicle (equipment) each driver wants to driveMy house fronts on to a road. Should I expect the occasional car or bus in my front garden and have no redress against the driver?