HawkeyeMS
Ryder Cup Winner
But is he good for the game as OP asked? He's good at golf but will not transcend the sport or engage the wider public I don't think.
Tiger did alright for the game, he has hardly been sparkling in front of camera.
But is he good for the game as OP asked? He's good at golf but will not transcend the sport or engage the wider public I don't think.
I think with the recent problems the American media will see him as the wholesome poster boy that kids should aspire to be.But is he good for the game as OP asked? He's good at golf but will not transcend the sport or engage the wider public I don't think.
I believe Speith has a sister who is severely autistic which I expect helps him put it all in perspective. Plus he an US golfer who likes to travel a bit, he went down well when he went to Oz and said the right things there.
Golf will never have the most famous sportsperson on the planet again, as it did with Tiger in his pomp. As others have pointed out, Tiger's popularity was a mixture of several things which Speith or anyone else will never emulate. But having a couple of relatively young players going head to head in majors will not be a bad thing for the game.
But is he good for the game as OP asked? He's good at golf but will not transcend the sport or engage the wider public I don't think.
Being good for the game and transcending the sport are two different things though. Any young player capable of mixing it with the best and winning majors is good for the game. Beyond that is a different kettle of fish.