Pin-seeker
Well-known member
Thinks he's got a few Dutch titles and a copA America too
You can get Dutch titles out of a happy meal
Thinks he's got a few Dutch titles and a copA America too
I think medals on the table does the job. Ronaldo loads, Messi even more. Suarez a league cup
Are you implying lampard is no good either? Jeepers!!
There's also an online vote each season, last year MILLIONS and Suarez didn't feature? Guess they're wrong too?
i do presume that if Suarez were ever to win the balon dor you'll not gloat. What with it not counting an all......
The erdevisse is rubbish.
Dont those medals count them ?
Im guessing his Copa America medal also doesnt count
The Dutch league is on a par with league 1 maybe? The cops America has no where near the depth of Europe they don't even have enough teams to fill all the spaces
:rofl:
So im guessing Messi must have a few Copa Americas then.
I don't know what he's won but ide bet it's a lot more than Suarez
You can get Dutch titles out of a happy meal![]()
Beckham was not classed as overrated during his career because managers and knowledgeable fans alike knew exactly what he brought to the team. He was only seemingly overrated by the minority as they failed to understand what his role was or they measured his footballing skill against his massive media persona.
Beckham had a brilliant career based on dead-ball delivery and pin-sharp passing over short and long distances. Both of these skills are very hard and Beckham was the best of his generation. He was rubbish at the glamorous side of football, such as dribbling, heading, holding the ball up, tackling, beating people, but because he was deficient in these areas doesn't mean he wasn't as good a footballer as 'crowd pleasers' like Thierry Henry.
I tell you all one thing. Liverpoolphil is the most blinkered poster on the GM Forum when it comes to anything or anyone connected to posters football teams.
Of that there is no doubt,none at all.
Suarez up there with Messi and Ronaldo? Jesus Christ Phil do you really believe that?
Dont you like him taking your title then dodger? This could be the WWF final - where's them decorating ladders?
Piece - wise words about Beckham - spot on.:thup:
guest100718, so if you judge a player on medals:-
Phil Neville was miles better than Le Tiss (domestically). George Best was poorer than Geoff Hurst (internationally)?
Who brought beckham into it...![]()
Sorry,what?
I believe he was trying to highlight that winning medals doesnt automatically mean you are a better player than someone who didnt win medals
Le Tiss was a massively talented player but won nothing - going by Paddys theory on medals - Traore and Biscan were better players though
I get it, missed a few pages.
Harsh maybe on Neville, always did a good job. But defo not in catergory of le Tiss. Then again, many weren't and got more recognition.
Believe his loyalty held him back - would have and should have won a lot more if he had left but cant blame him for staying loyal to his home club
I suggest you watch a bit more of him. He wasn't fast, but that didn't matter. He would walk around players twice. The fact xavi himself said how respected he was in Europe shows just how good he was. Playing for little saints made people think he wasn't good enough. His highlight reel is as good as any player.!ANY,Le Tiss was a good player at a small club. He wouldn't have cut it at a top club IMO.