For those who do aimpoint

[HomerJSimpson]

£200? Insane. Does you get a free magnetic bracelet with the course too? Or an energy drink?

Not sure where that figure comes from (and in work so can't go looking, but I only paid £90 and as said already have the option to attend another course free of charge as a refresher should choose to do so

Have you had time to consider a response to Imurg questions ?



Very valid points and question I believe

I agreed with him regarding the point about needing to start it on line although that applies to whatever method you adopt. As for double breakers, the easies thing to do is take two measurements for each slope to see how much it moves. BEFORE anyone says it takes too long, I can do an accurate read inside 10-15 seconds which I'd argue is as quick as someone studying their putt in a traditional method although TBH that is a side issue and not the point in question. A downhill/uphill putt works the same way as you're measuring the angle of the slope so take the mid point for both parts and get a read. There is a more advanced course that the pros and caddies (and open to the public if you really want it) that gives the absolute definitive way to read these sort of putts but at my level, splitting it into sections works as well and I can still get an accurate read.

As I've said, those that use it think its great and reliable. Those that don't have their own preferred method. Each to their own and as a game about getting a white ball in a hole, how that's achieved is immaterial as long as it's done as quickly as possible

 

[CMAC]

I think this is the aimpoint that most of us associate with the name

http://www.toursticks.com/pages/Tour-Sticks-Putting-Drills-—-Aim-Point.html

 

[3565]

Have you had time to consider a response to Imurg questions ?



Very valid points and question I believe

look you and others don't get it and won't ever get it as it's nothing new. In another Aimpoint post I spent time explaining how it works and you were involved with that as well. i could explain the double breaking putts in how to work it out from the inflection point but by the time you lot read it you'll be shouting SLOW PLAY SLOW PLAY, and any other obstacles you can think of to throw at us. Your clearly not interested in it other then to discredit it and us when ever you can. If that's how you are as a person then ............

Just for a change, to see if you HAVE taken any note of us looney Aimpointers, How do we go about getting our break value for a 15 ft putt?

 

[Deleted member 15344]

look you and others don't get it and won't ever get it as it's nothing new. In another Aimpoint post I spent time explaining how it works and you were involved with that as well. i could explain the double breaking putts in how to work it out from the inflection point but by the time you lot read it you'll be shouting SLOW PLAY SLOW PLAY, and any other obstacles you can think of to throw at us. Your clearly not interested in it other then to discredit it and us when ever you can. If that's how you are as a person then ............

Just for a change, to see if you HAVE taken any note of us looney Aimpointers, How do we go about getting our break value for a 15 ft putt?

I'm guessing the answer is no.

Ok cheers :thup:

 

[3565]

I'm guessing the answer is no.

Ok cheers :thup:

:rofl: Thats cos you not got an E double F in clue.........see ya

 

[Deleted member 15344]

:rofl: Thats cos you not got an E double F in clue.........see ya

No that's because there is zero point in talking to you about it because your instant reaction is to go on the defence and then pretty much the attack against people who possibly have valid questions or concerns or issues with it.

You were all bright and button tailed and smart when Scott was putting well and used it as an example of aimpoint being great - when he started putting badly - different story then.

Read what a homer has posted - I may have had arguments with him in the past but his responses are a great deal better than yours in this thread.

 

[Deleted member 15344]

I think this is the aimpoint that most of us associate with the name

http://www.toursticks.com/pages/Tour-Sticks-Putting-Drills-—-Aim-Point.html

Have had a crack doing that - works really well I reckon :thup:

 

[3565]

No that's because there is zero point in talking to you about it because your instant reaction is to go on the defence and then pretty much the attack against people who possibly have valid questions or concerns or issues with it.

You were all bright and button tailed and smart when Scott was putting well and used it as an example of aimpoint being great - when he started putting badly - different story then.

Read what a homer has posted - I may have had arguments with him in the past but his responses are a great deal better than yours in this thread.

Thats cos you only read what you want to read and take from it. In past Aimpoint posts I've explained, like someone said do a search and read. When your trying to put a valid point across, you just put obstacles in the way and DONT even say, yes I can see where your coming from with that, it's just your view and your view only. So I'm really wasting my time with you cos your stuck in your own little way of doing things. I didn't need to reply to Imurg as Homer already explained it, again showing you read only what you want to..

Scott's down fall in the Honda if you listened to Steve Williams radio interview a few days later was, what you keep harping on about, lack of pace? Is that Aimpoints fault? No, Aimpoint doesn't swing the club, it was he who swung it, he may of read the putt right but his pace was off. No system can account for that not even the OLD method. You should know that, your not that thick! Or am I missing something, maybe I ought to ask Oliver Ross or James Lyle about that!
:thup:

 

[Deleted member 15344]

Thats cos you only read what you want to read and take from it. In past Aimpoint posts I've explained, like someone said do a search and read. When your trying to put a valid point across, you just put obstacles in the way and DONT even say, yes I can see where your coming from with that, it's just your view and your view only. So I'm really wasting my time with you cos your stuck in your own little way of doing things. I didn't need to reply to Imurg as Homer already explained it, again showing you read only what you want to..

Scott's down fall in the Honda if you listened to Steve Williams radio interview a few days later was, what you keep harping on about, lack of pace? Is that Aimpoints fault? No, Aimpoint doesn't swing the club, it was he who swung it, he may of read the putt right but his pace was off. No system can account for that not even the OLD method. You should know that, your not that thick! Or am I missing something, maybe I ought to ask Oliver Ross or James Lyle about that!
:thup:

Who ?