For those who do aimpoint

[MendieGK]

Your points are the same on every Aimpoint thread. You don't like it or see the point.thats fair enough but those of us that do, including pros and good club players, think there is something in it. I would never criticise your approach to golf and would be grateful if you didn't do the same to mine. I like it, I think it helps.

I havent done the course, but my dad has, and as a Cat1 golfer it has improved his putting, no doubt.

My issue with this thread is that too many people are commenting who havent tried it, so in my view cant really have an opinion with any merit. I only pass an opinion on what i have seen.

I am assuming that the people commenting negatively aren't tours golfer with the putting ability of Steve Stricker.....so unless you're taking 18putts a round (maximum) then your putting can always be improved - why does it matter if that is to try a new method?

your OLD method of just reading the line etc clearly isnt as effective as you think otherwise you'd be on tour!!

 

[chrisd]

My Club posts the stimp reading on its website every single morning for both courses - Just saying

We get our information the more traditional way!

Someone finishing their round mumbles either "them greens were awful today" or "bloomin eck, I don't think I've seen em that quick for months" who needs modern technology when you've got precise information!!

 

[richart]

We get our information the more traditional way!

Someone finishing their round mumbles either "them greens were awful today" or "bloomin eck, I don't think I've seen em that quick for months" who needs modern technology when you've got precise information!!

I usually get told they are 'too quick for your dodgy stroke'.

 

[MendieGK]

I usually get told they are 'too quick for your dodgy stroke'.

At Blackmoor in the summer....doesnt suprise me!

 

[Deleted member 15344]

I havent done the course, but my dad has, and as a Cat1 golfer it has improved his putting, no doubt.

My issue with this thread is that too many people are commenting who havent tried it, so in my view cant really have an opinion with any merit. I only pass an opinion on what i have seen.

I am assuming that the people commenting negatively aren't tours golfer with the putting ability of Steve Stricker.....so unless you're taking 18putts a round (maximum) then your putting can always be improved - why does it matter if that is to try a new method?

your OLD method of just reading the line etc clearly isnt as effective as you think otherwise you'd be on tour!!

Or perhaps they take 3 shots to get to the green

You mention Stricker - does he use aimpoint ? Donald ? Snedeker ?

I have seen someone use Aimpoint so does that mean I can post a valid opinion ?

This morning I had 21 putts 15 single putts - using the "OLD" method

 

[MendieGK]

Or perhaps they take 3 shots to get to the green

You mention Stricker - does he use aimpoint ? Donald ? Snedeker ?

I have seen someone use Aimpoint so does that mean I can post a valid opinion ?

This morning I had 21 putts 15 single putts - using the "OLD" method

21putts, what you shoot? 55?

obviously, you can have an opinion but doesnt mean you have to 'mock' other people. I just find it frustating, if someone wants to pay £200 to try and improve their game then thats their choice.

People keep saying its not just about the line, what about pace. the programme assumes you can consistently hit the ball a certain distance past the hole (if you miss).

 

[MendieGK]

Or perhaps they take 3 shots to get to the green

You mention Stricker - does he use aimpoint ? Donald ? Snedeker ?

I have seen someone use Aimpoint so does that mean I can post a valid opinion ?

This morning I had 21 putts 15 single putts - using the "OLD" method

You're clearly not averse to spending money on golf, given the fact every single one of you clubs is a TM - you've been 'sold' on the whole 'loft up' campaign and its already out of date - dont see anyone slagging that off

 

[Deleted member 15344]

21putts, what you shoot? 55?

obviously, you can have an opinion but doesnt mean you have to 'mock' other people. I just find it frustating, if someone wants to pay £200 to try and improve their game then thats their choice.

People keep saying its not just about the line, what about pace. the programme assumes you can consistently hit the ball a certain distance past the hole (if you miss).

I had a 68 this morning :thup:

How many amateurs do you know that can hit the putt consistently past the hole the same distance ? I know I certainly can't

 

[Robobum]

You're clearly not averse to spending money on golf, given the fact every single one of you clubs is a TM - you've been 'sold' on the whole 'loft up' campaign and its already out of date - dont see anyone slagging that off

You can't read many threads then

 

[3565]

You're clearly not averse to spending money on golf, given the fact every single one of you clubs is a TM - you've been 'sold' on the whole 'loft up' campaign and its already out of date - dont see anyone slagging that off

:rofl::thup:

 

[Deleted member 15344]

You're clearly not averse to spending money on golf, given the fact every single one of you clubs is a TM - you've been 'sold' on the whole 'loft up' campaign and its already out of date - dont see anyone slagging that off

If you haven't seen anyone slag the "loft up" campaign then just do a search on here - loads have

I wasn't "sold" on anything in regards campaigns - I tested loads of drivers out and picked the best one :thup:

And buying clubs is quite necessary to actually play the game :thup:

 

[Green Bay Hacker]

Before the 'Adam Scott putting well using Aimpoint at The Masters' thread, I had never even heard of Aimpoint so at least I now roughly know the ins and outs of it.

Personally I would not consider using it due to the cost and having to bother with charts etc but if it helps others and gives them confidence then I can see why they do.

 

[CMAC]

You're clearly not averse to spending money on golf, given the fact every single one of you clubs is a TM - you've been 'sold' on the whole 'loft up' campaign and its already out of date - dont see anyone slagging that off

au contraire mon amis..................almost a weekly occurrence with some on here

 

[AmandaJR]

Without reading back through the whole thread...I'm not sure it is a case of "slagging off" rather than questioning the validity and efficacy of a rather expensive product. Also said product versus what else is available and potentially just as effective and/or cheaper.

I don't buy into the "you haven't tried it so you can't have an opinion". I haven't tried bungee jumping or fire walking but my opinion is I wouldn't enjoy either...

 

[Deleted member 15344]

Without reading back through the whole thread...I'm not sure it is a case of "slagging off" rather than questioning the validity and efficacy of a rather expensive product. Also said product versus what else is available and potentially just as effective and/or cheaper.

I don't buy into the "you haven't tried it so you can't have an opinion". I haven't tried bungee jumping or fire walking but my opinion is I wouldn't enjoy either...

Spot on Amanda - summed up perfectly :thup:

 

[HomerJSimpson]

Without reading back through the whole thread...I'm not sure it is a case of "slagging off" rather than questioning the validity and efficacy of a rather expensive product. Also said product versus what else is available and potentially just as effective and/or cheaper.

I don't buy into the "you haven't tried it so you can't have an opinion". I haven't tried bungee jumping or fire walking but my opinion is I wouldn't enjoy either...

Spot on Amanda - summed up perfectly :thup:

And by the same token, those that have tried and used it feel they are reaping some dividends in terms of improved reads and putting. I think the doubters have put their case as have the believers and haven't seen anything different from either camp that will change opinions of those on either side of the fence. I'd never critiscise anyone on here for their own approach to the game (Timgolfy not withstanding and his opening tee shot validated my opinion) as its such an individualistic game and is the reason I get fiercely protective of my own approaches and pursuit towards my own goal of single figures. I may disagree (often do) but if someone wants to go down that avenue (loft up/down, lessons/not, change of kit, prayer and therapy) then best ot of British and hope like me they reach where they want to go

 

[Snelly]

Just googled Aimpoint and it looks like a right load of old tripe to me.

That said, Robert Rock uses it so it must be good......

£200? Insane. Does you get a free magnetic bracelet with the course too? Or an energy drink?


I wonder how Sam Snead shot 61 to win his first amateur tournament in 1936 without the aid of this approach? Seems hard to fathom...

 

[3565]

And by the same token, those that have tried and used it feel they are reaping some dividends in terms of improved reads and putting. I think the doubters have put their case as have the believers and haven't seen anything different from either camp that will change opinions of those on either side of the fence. I'd never critiscise anyone on here for their own approach to the game (Timgolfy not withstanding and his opening tee shot validated my opinion) as its such an individualistic game and is the reason I get fiercely protective of my own approaches and pursuit towards my own goal of single figures. I may disagree (often do) but if someone wants to go down that avenue (loft up/down, lessons/not, change of kit, prayer and therapy) then best ot of British and hope like me they reach where they want to go

to quote someone

Spot on Homer - summed up perfectly. :rofl:

 

[Deleted member 15344]

And by the same token, those that have tried and used it feel they are reaping some dividends in terms of improved reads and putting. I think the doubters have put their case as have the believers and haven't seen anything different from either camp that will change opinions of those on either side of the fence. I'd never critiscise anyone on here for their own approach to the game (Timgolfy not withstanding and his opening tee shot validated my opinion) as its such an individualistic game and is the reason I get fiercely protective of my own approaches and pursuit towards my own goal of single figures. I may disagree (often do) but if someone wants to go down that avenue (loft up/down, lessons/not, change of kit, prayer and therapy) then best ot of British and hope like me they reach where they want to go

No problems at all with that Homer :thup:

 

[Deleted member 15344]

to quote someone

Spot on Homer - summed up perfectly. :rofl:

Have you had time to consider a response to Imurg questions ?

Here's a question about aimpoint using Amanda's experience above....and this is it having a go at the method.

In Amanda's example Joe Aimpoint uses the method to determine his line - OK I can see that.
But if his pace and initial direction are so poor - how does he know that his reads are correct?
If he reads 3 inches outside right of the cup but his direction is 3 inches outside left, how does he know he's reading the greens accurately?

I guess what I'm saying is that any reading method relies on you bing able to start the ball on that linear the right pace.If any of those 3 elements are lacking you may as well just close your eyes and use The Force...

So in order to be able to use Aimpoint effectively, you have to be a reasonable putter to be able to start the ball on the correct line with the correct pace.
If you're a reasonable putter you should be able to read greens effectively anyway.........

And I'd still love to know how Aimpoint woks with double-break or downhill-then-uphill putts because I rarely get a putt with a single break or single slope....

Very valid points and question I believe