Tiger man
Challenge Tour Pro
Yessssssssss! I love polls:clap:
gotta be that blue jpx
gotta be that blue jpx
Old flat volleyball that Tom Hanks lost?!
Seriously though, i have seen them in the store. Might have a pop.
The D200 is a real eye opener, well it was for me.
I just bought a Ping G20, so none of the above ;-)
Wow - 100 votes in and nothing for the Cobra!
I got a G30 off ebay end of last year, terrific club. Improved my ball flight loads and distance has been gained!
Previously played Cobra Amp (2011/2012?) Was excellent for forgiveness and helped me loads. Wanted to wait to try the FlyZ but couldn't wait until Feb to try/buy.
Wonder if the results would vary with the following added as a condition:
You actually have to be prepared to pay for it
Would the 915 at £330 still have quite so many votes?
(especially with the previous model at £160)
Interesting. I did want this to be just about the club but It would be interesting to see.
I do love a good poll. Every thread I do seems to have a poll
Wilson?
Not being able to justify the cost of one of the big name drivers I've recently got myself a Wilson FG M3 Tour driver. Does the job for me and at £89.99 I would say it's a bargain.
This is always a questionable term for me, what are we classing as a "big name", is it those companies that simply market stronger in publications, get their many ambassadors to put the newly released drivers in their bags immediately on tour, invite joe public on testing days and flood the corners of the country with new products so network marketing is naturally undertaken, and the list could go on..
With all the above taking place, is it no wonder that those that have to pay for these specific latest drivers are looking at £299.00 plus, after all, someone has got to pay for all those subsidised and give-away drivers, not to mention all the advertising, sponsorship and marketing!
Or, could a big name driver still come from a company that mainly concentrates on the product itself with all the same or similar style of technology that is involved in various forms and as such it finds it can match and perform as well as some of those drivers that are heavily marketed and deemed to be "bigger names"?
Are we swayed by price alone, in that, do we think because its so much cheaper it must be inferior?
I was very impressed with the Wilson D200 on a recent driver exercise I took part in, knowing what drivers can cost and believing that the Wilson brand name is a very strong one, I would have thought its price point would be around £249-£299, so I am pleasantly surprised to see it around the £199 mark and even cheaper in some places, but, does that price make it come across to us as consumers as a lesser product than those being punted at £299-£349 or £399 as a £100+ variable is considerable!
Looking at last years models now which at the time were the latest all-singing and dancing must have drivers, you can now pick them up for 40-50% less than their launch prices, mainly because another newer model has been produced, so, is the strength of marketing becoming more important than the product itself to catch as many consumers as possible to impulse buy chasing those extra 10yds, adjust-ability and perfect ball flights, or are we all becoming more savy and waiting for those latest models which we all craved last year to become the older model and drop into our price range, and if that is becoming more the case and where a rush of new sales comes from against the latest models, then why don't manufacturers grasp that and sell at a more acceptable price point and look for a dominant brand presence based more on the quality of the driver alone.
I would love to see 6 unbranded (unknown) drivers put together and fitted to a range of handicapped golfers and then judged and see which manufacturers came out on top, would it still be the same as those we see all the time because we are unconsciously swayed by the brand, its price or strength of marketing, or would it really throw up a curve ball?
Sorry for the long post, I woke up early :smirk:
Jesus Fish you can babble on at 6am.
Seriously tho I think your spot on. I wonder how many people when testing new drivers actually try the likes of Wilson or Benross with a view to buying one.
I reckon it's more likely that they know it's between say 4/5 brands which they'll end up with before even hitting them.
Jesus Fish you can babble on at 6am.
Seriously tho I think your spot on. I wonder how many people when testing new drivers actually try the likes of Wilson or Benross with a view to buying one.
I reckon it's more likely that they know it's between say 4/5 brands which they'll end up with before even hitting them.
Don't forget up until the mid-1990's Wilson were one of the 'big names' in Golf.
They nowadays seem to have committed resources to the tennis market, but given their history should still have enough knowledge to copy the big boys, albeit a season or so behind as their R&D resources are not as big as say Titleist, Callaway or Taylor Made.
Does this make their products inferior? Probably not. Although, They do have the drawback of not being as widely available as the big boys and limited in the ability to customise, so will limit the market they can appeal to.