I agree that is the reality but surely a decent interview process will easily find out if your CV is dodgy? Unlike a number a of interviews I had recently where neither of them asked about anything on my CV and just used set questions. I understand this might make it easier to grade different candidates but it allows for some inflated claims to get through the initial sift with little or no evidence to back up the claims. It also means people are more likely to pay for professional CV writers to create a fanciful picture of the client who cannot back it up with any hard evidence or experience.In reality, how often are CV's checked? Most people take them at face value. I'm not saying that is the right practice, but it is the reality.
I presume you mean the actual subjects.In the 1980's I had one guy who claimed 6 'o' levels two years before they were introduced.
[and for the record, I did ask him if he had continued with his education studies after school......that was a double NO.]
They were CSE's Jim.I presume you mean the actual subjects.
I did my O levels in 1967
Although a search says GCSEs did not come in to 1986 I have a memory of them being done if a person attended a secondary modern school when I did my O level GCEs with a grade a GCSE being considered equivalent to a grade C GCE.
Could my age and a memory of something from 60 years ago.
Are you not thinking of CSE? @Pants has just beaten me to itI presume you mean the actual subjects.
I did my O levels in 1967
Although a search says GCSEs did not come in to 1986 I have a memory of them being done if a person attended a secondary modern school when I did my O level GCEs with a grade a GCSE being considered equivalent to a grade C GCE.
Could my age and a memory of something from 60 years ago.
They were CSE's Jim.
CSE results
The performance of students for the CSE exams is described by means of a grading scheme* in which
* Results for shorthand are shown in terms of speed only
- Grade 1 describes a standard such that the student might reasonably have attained grade A, B or C at Ordinary level of the GCE exams had he/she followed a course leading to that exam.
- Grades 2 and 3 describe standards of performance falling between grades 1 and 4.
- Grade 4 describes the standard of performance expected from a student of average ability in the subject who has applied him/herself to a course of study regarded by teachers of the subject as appropriate to the student's age, ability and aptitude.
- Grade 5 describes a standard of performance which is within the scope of the CSE exams system, but which is below that expected for grade 4.
They were CSE's Jim.
CSE results
The performance of students for the CSE exams is described by means of a grading scheme* in which
* Results for shorthand are shown in terms of speed only
- Grade 1 describes a standard such that the student might reasonably have attained grade A, B or C at Ordinary level of the GCE exams had he/she followed a course leading to that exam.
- Grades 2 and 3 describe standards of performance falling between grades 1 and 4.
- Grade 4 describes the standard of performance expected from a student of average ability in the subject who has applied him/herself to a course of study regarded by teachers of the subject as appropriate to the student's age, ability and aptitude.
- Grade 5 describes a standard of performance which is within the scope of the CSE exams system, but which is below that expected for grade 4.
My only CSE was in art and design, which I took as a soft option so I could enjoy the banter with my mates. I was bloody awful at it. So bad, even my unaided piece was copied out of a book. Badly.
I got a Grade 4.
Are you not thinking of CSE? @Pants has just beaten me to it
In 1969, my GCE 'O' levels were graded numerically, 1 to 6 for a pass rather than the alphabetic version. But maybe different exam boards changed yo alphabetic earlier than others?They were CSE's Jim.
CSE results
The performance of students for the CSE exams is described by means of a grading scheme* in which
* Results for shorthand are shown in terms of speed only
- Grade 1 describes a standard such that the student might reasonably have attained grade A, B or C at Ordinary level of the GCE exams had he/she followed a course leading to that exam.
- Grades 2 and 3 describe standards of performance falling between grades 1 and 4.
- Grade 4 describes the standard of performance expected from a student of average ability in the subject who has applied him/herself to a course of study regarded by teachers of the subject as appropriate to the student's age, ability and aptitude.
- Grade 5 describes a standard of performance which is within the scope of the CSE exams system, but which is below that expected for grade 4.
If I remember correctly, GCE grades A - E were a pass. CSE grade 1 was deemed to be equivalent to Grade C GCE.In 1969, my GCE 'O' levels were graded numerically, 1 to 6 for a pass rather than the alphabetic version. But maybe different exam boards changed yo alphabetic earlier than others?
We were graded by letter. University of London exam BoardIn 1969, my GCE 'O' levels were graded numerically, 1 to 6 for a pass rather than the alphabetic version. But maybe different exam boards changed yo alphabetic earlier than others?
I did a mix of London and Oxford O-levels.We were graded by letter. University of London exam Board
The HR person who pointed out to me that the interviewee was a lying so and so was brilliant at her job.
Mind you she did quietly tell me, 'never employ a man who wears white socks'.
Well it was the 1980's.