Ken_A
Tour Rookie
For father’s day my 2 year old got me the book dream on by John Richardson - It’s a wonderful read so far. There is a lot of parts of the book I would love to talk about - some time, today I want to get the thoughts on putting
John tells us that the brain has 2 sides the RHS (creative side) and the LHS (methodical bit) - no huge surprise - he then mentions that people who use the ~RHS side have less putts than the folk who use the LHS.
Generally I dont think about it much I just fog my mind into not thinking about it and putt.
For my handicap I am generally a very good putter, If I think about the line and really think about the breaks and weight (I am an engineer, so its natural) then I normally mess it up by only getting half way there or misreading the line etc.
I certainly believe in the theory - but with so many fancy putters, putting aids etc perhaps we are taught wrong!! (by the way I hear the Veasy is great
)
I remember watching the fantastic Lee Westwood in an interview and he mentioned the fact that he was and always has been a poor putter - this RHSvLHS argument would mean the likes of Lee would only be as good as he is - as you cant help people to become creative unless they are creative, yes a brain coach may help but if tiger is naturally more creative then he will be a better putter.
What's your thoughts?
John tells us that the brain has 2 sides the RHS (creative side) and the LHS (methodical bit) - no huge surprise - he then mentions that people who use the ~RHS side have less putts than the folk who use the LHS.
Generally I dont think about it much I just fog my mind into not thinking about it and putt.
For my handicap I am generally a very good putter, If I think about the line and really think about the breaks and weight (I am an engineer, so its natural) then I normally mess it up by only getting half way there or misreading the line etc.
I certainly believe in the theory - but with so many fancy putters, putting aids etc perhaps we are taught wrong!! (by the way I hear the Veasy is great
I remember watching the fantastic Lee Westwood in an interview and he mentioned the fact that he was and always has been a poor putter - this RHSvLHS argument would mean the likes of Lee would only be as good as he is - as you cant help people to become creative unless they are creative, yes a brain coach may help but if tiger is naturally more creative then he will be a better putter.
What's your thoughts?