Obviously the sledge crossed the line. That's the line identified and constantly moved by Warner whenever it suits.
He was fortunate the opposition allowed him to resume his innings. They behaved like adults after he behaved like a child.
I'd imagine he's gonna get plenty more next summer in the Ashes.
Can't see him playing for the Aussies again.
Grade A to**er, embarrassment to the baggy green cap.
Might have been about his Mrs & sonny bill!!we all know Warners crossed the line in the past, he admitted he did against Trott!!!
what makes this more interesting is who the sledgee was (the late Phil Hughes brother), if it hadnt been for that then Id happily laugh at the hypocrisy and utter ridiculousness that Warner thinks he has the right to be the one to decide where the line is (having been so far the wrong side of it most of his career) but in this situation, maybe, just maybe he did the right thing removing himself rather than staying, and if he had stayed, getting involved. id love to know what was said thats for sure!
we all know Warners crossed the line in the past, he admitted he did against Trott!!!
what makes this more interesting is who the sledgee was (the late Phil Hughes brother), if it hadnt been for that then Id happily laugh at the hypocrisy and utter ridiculousness that Warner thinks he has the right to be the one to decide where the line is (having been so far the wrong side of it most of his career) but in this situation, maybe, just maybe he did the right thing removing himself rather than staying, and if he had stayed, getting involved. id love to know what was said thats for sure!
With the greatest of respect to other Australians.......he's Australian!!!He could just, you know, stay and not get involved. Or does he not realise that he does have the option to keep his gob shut and just get on with it?
.
If he had stayed and it got out of hand people be saying he should have been the bigger man and walk away , maybe he learned from the trott incident .. I do get the irony of it , but it only takes the wrong word or statement to effect to trigger something ,
perhaps walking off was better that what might have gotten said re hughes brother ..lets be honest from past history warner talks before thinking normally ..
Has teed himself up for a lot more tho
If he had stayed and it got out of hand people be saying he should have been the bigger man and walk away , maybe he learned from the trott incident .. I do get the irony of it , but it only takes the wrong word or statement to effect to trigger something ,
perhaps walking off was better that what might have gotten said re hughes brother ..lets be honest from past history warner talks before thinking normally ..
Has teed himself up for a lot more tho
with the mess cricket australia are in i cant see them ever picking him again .. could b wrong thoOr he could have just ignored it and carried on regardless.
What's he going to do next summer when he gets it both barrels? Cos i cant imagine Joe Root allowing him to resume his innings if he walks off.
There is something behind letting him back on anywayIf he was getting sledged off Phil Hughes’ brother then his Phil is fair game for any return sledging imo. And I bet that’s what Hughes thought and was trying to get him to take the bait. Maybe why they allowed him back, because it was their own player’s attempts to use his own brother’s death as ammunition that was decidedly dodgy ground.
with the mess cricket australia are in i cant see them ever picking him again .. could b wrong tho