williamalex1
Money List Winner
That's the new type stud I fitted to my Adizero tours , but I've not had a chance to check if they make any difference .Looks like they've changed the cleats on the new version...
That's the new type stud I fitted to my Adizero tours , but I've not had a chance to check if they make any difference .Looks like they've changed the cleats on the new version...
might is the key word!
Facts? what facts? 1 or 2 courses have banned them? what about the hundreds of courses that havent, and the golfers that don't see any issues with them? these are also facts.
The 'eveidence' so far appears to be some indentations caused by ice build up on the soles, something that happens with pretty much every golf shoe
What are FJ going to do ?
Laugh I suspect.....
Why ? Don't their new shoes feature the same type of sole design as the Adizero's ?
I bought a pair of these for the winter as they are marketed as waterproof golf shoes. I must admit from the very first time I wore them I was aware they left very large indents in the greens. My course uses the turf irons for the comps during winter and I noticed the marks are not as bad on firmer greens but they are still there and take longer to fade the firmer the green is. I think these shoes have been made and tested for American conditions as the sole is very thin and the cleat housing is pronounced plus the cleat is very long. If Adidas Have not tested them on greens in the winter in the UK then that is a very poor testing programme. The new shoes for 2014 look the same except they have one more cleat under the arch of the foot = seven cleats. I think this is half the problem as my FJ Icons have nine on each foot and the load is more spread out over the shoe. The indents on the greens do look bad as the sun is low in the winter. my playing partner has bought a pair and when we have finished on the greens we look back and say " I would not like to be playing behind us today " These shoes are not cheap and some golfers can't afford to have multiple pairs The big problem would be when these shoes were allowed and when not who makes the decision and how do you inform the members. If they are deemed fit for use only in summer the legal position will be very tricky as I am sure Adidas will challenge it so by the time the court case is run you will need new shoes anyway. there is no dought in my mind this is a design flaw and will need to be addressed so will it affect sales this is the one thing that may force Adidas to do something about itI posted earlier that I had changed the spikes/cleats on only one shoe as a experiment to see if the spikes/cleats were to blame. Results- the unchanged spikes left less of a indentation than the replacements on our very soft greens, but still looked a deeper than normal indentation.
But after putting out we stood discussing the indentations [the course was empty not holding anyone up] after roughly 10 mins we checked the green again, and the first indentations that had been made were almost gone.
So any damage is short lived less than coring, hollow tining or spiking.
After we finished our round we spoke to our h/g keeper about the marks he said " they will return to normal in a short time."
Line dancing classes for you Dude. there's a goodin eh haw:If you think last year's adiZeros were bad, have a look at these bad boys from Justin Golf....
View attachment 8882
Played Tuesday with a buddy your guys will like this,
Buddy, wearing tours, approx 11 stone - massive imprints left
Me, wearing 6spike , approx 16 stone, next no no imprints,
It's definitely the tours that are causing issues.
A set of scales on the first tee should sort that out.I've received my 6 spike today and weigh mid way between you two, will I make a mark or not?