clubchamp98
Journeyman Pro
Only just seen the news .Their actual statement differs massively from the press version.
Some people never learn.
In what way does it differ?
He has confessed on live TV.
So why can’t the Police say he has or hasn’t.
Only just seen the news .Their actual statement differs massively from the press version.
Some people never learn.
Time to move on, man did wrong, nothing going to happen with reporters trying to keep the story going. As to the argument, he did so I will, crack on, I know idiots that speed, drink and drive and are most probably not insured, doesn't mean I'm going to do it. Idiot put his family at risk, not my concern.Isn't it.
Think I posted same earlier.
Got lost in the froth.
Think your right about them but they are in opposition and didn’t make the rules like Cummings.Isn't it.
Think I posted same earlier.
Got lost in the froth.
Sorry SILH but that post is absolute tripe imo. Boris was right to point out that the scientists shouldn't be directly asked to answer political questions. Boris isn't, by the looks of it, going to sack Cummings so why answer the same question time after time? How does Cummings have "something on our PM" , I suspect its because Cummings us considered vital to the future plans, especially Brexit and thereby lies the point - you remainers are keen to see him go, so to weaken the Brexit and hope that we then look to ask for the extension - no chance mate!
That is down to a magistrate or jury.So why can’t the Police say he has or hasn’t.
You have to be charged with something before you go to court.That is down to a magistrate or jury.
The headline was along the lines of police say cummings guilty.Only just seen the news .
In what way does it differ?
He has confessed on live TV.
So why can’t the Police say he has or hasn’t.
So to paraphrase, are you saying that Cummings is untouchable as Boris is an incompetent popularist and the rest of the cabinet are clueless charlatans, who left to their own devices will probably screw Brexit up. Which is not great as basically the only reason the vast majority of them are there in the first place is the fact they claimed to be able to get Brexit done?
Agree.Time to move on, man did wrong, nothing going to happen with reporters trying to keep the story going. As to the argument, he did so I will, crack on, I know idiots that speed, drink and drive and are most probably not insured, doesn't mean I'm going to do it. Idiot put his family at risk, not my concern.
That is down to a magistrate or jury.
One paraphrases in order to achieve greater clarity.So to paraphrase, are you saying that Cummings is untouchable as Boris is an incompetent popularist and the rest of the cabinet are clueless charlatans, who left to their own devices will probably screw Brexit up. Which is not great as basically the only reason the vast majority of them are there in the first place is the fact they claimed to be able to get Brexit done?
Far be it from me to be one of the aforementioned pedants, but that’s not why we paraphrase. Old bean ?One paraphrases in order to achieve greater clarity.
You've managed to achieve less old bean.
Nothing to do with Brexit other than I find it difficult to believe anything that Cummings says given his own admissions - and given he is the words behind Johnson that gives me problems when Johnson is shutting journalists up when they question him directly or indirectly about what Cummings did and whether it is appropriate for the rest of us. So tripe away. Keep asking the questions on Cummings LK, RP et al. Fine by me. And if Johnson wants to show himself up as an empty jacket who will shut down questioning he doesn't like then so be it.Sorry SILH but that post is absolute tripe imo. Boris was right to point out that the scientists shouldn't be directly asked to answer political questions. Boris isn't, by the looks of it, going to sack Cummings so why answer the same question time after time? How does Cummings have "something on our PM" , I suspect its because Cummings us considered vital to the future plans, especially Brexit and thereby lies the point - you remainers are keen to see him go, so to weaken the Brexit and hope that we then look to ask for the extension - no chance mate!
Fine by me.
Nope, I am saying that Cummings is the Government CHIEF advisor and will not be sacrificed just to be a notch on the belt of the biased BBC and gutter press even though I do accept the castle trip was not in keeping with the rules. However, if Cummings should go so should the 4 Labour MP's but I see no clamour for that and its therefore obvious that it's a purely a political matter and really not anything about what he'd done.
Isn't it also interesting that the 4 Labour MP's who (apparently) broke the lockdown eg Kinnock etc, haven't been asked to resign by Starmer or the crew on here baying for Cummings departure ?
Yet no one quotes the tory minister who broke the rules.Isn't it.
Think I posted same earlier.
Got lost in the froth.
Whatever you do, don’t mention Jenrick.Think your right about them but they are in opposition and didn’t make the rules like Cummings.
Then disregard your own work.
Cambridge, amongst others, would be to differ...Far be it from me to be one of the aforementioned pedants, but that’s not why we paraphrase. Old bean ?
1. Have you checked the title of the thread!!Sorry but another political post with clear Brexit undertones...
I cannot see how he could be considered 'vital' to a project (selling Brexit) that is now complete and has moved to a completely different phase - implementation!...I suspect its because Cummings us considered vital to the future plans, especially Brexit...