D
Deleted member 21784
Guest
It's proven so far if you pre warn of a change you get idiots like this
If you don't you get moaned at
Lose lose
Nothing to do with pre-warning people, it’s more obvious the message isn’t getting through.It's proven so far if you pre warn of a change you get idiots like this
If you don't you get moaned at
Lose lose
Nothing to do with pre-warning people, it’s more obvious the message isn’t getting through.
London has been like this since the pubs re-opened.![]()
What message? Parts of the North East under extra lockdown with lower infection rates than parts of London.No, the message is getting through. They have got the message. They are choosing to ignore it.
What message? Parts of the North East under extra lockdown with lower infection rates than parts of London.
Just what is the message to people in London.
Why is blanket coverage ok only up North?
In a way , you are both right. But HK makes an indisputable point.
If you left it to common sense, honourable and sensible people would take the necessary care.
But a lot, and in this country now it is a lot, of people are choosing not to have those attributes, so rules as opposed to guidance, are necessary for them- but , of course, some are also defiant and they readily break the rules, making it easy to lay the blame on the rule makers .Because, even that defiance is not acknowledged by many, for various nefarious reasons.
It boils down to " Einstein was right"
But when normal, intelligent people are abiding by the rules/guidance in one area are ok and then in an identical area in other parts of the Country they behave the same, we only label one lot as idiots.Without going too political they don't want to anger the heartlands
But surely the basic three guidelines underpin everything, all the additional rules do is reinforce them.Just want to reiterate that I'm not condemning those that do break the rules.
The challenge is that the guidance to stop the spread by social distancing, hands washing etc is sound. But within that general common sense guidance, rules are needed as, rightly or wrongly, the location and situation means that you can do different things at different times in different places within that guidance.
But when normal, intelligent people are abiding by the rules/guidance in one area are ok and then in an identical area in other parts of the Country they behave the same, we only label one lot as idiots.
It’s time to lockdown the whole Country again imo.
The infection rates per 100,000 speak for themselves. In areas where they are low there's no need for a lockdown.But when normal, intelligent people are abiding by the rules/guidance in one area are ok and then in an identical area in other parts of the Country they behave the same, we only label one lot as idiots.
It’s time to lockdown the whole Country again imo.
Could hospital admissions also be a factor?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51768274
Also a cases map in the link
You mean like parts of the North East and North West were that has happened, whole region treated with a broad brush.The infection rates per 100,000 speak for themselves. In areas where they are low there's no need for a lockdown.
Yes, except it seems in and around London.?Could hospital admissions also be a factor?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51768274
Also a cases map in the link
Very interesting charts there and no understandable reason why they would be higher in the north than the south ..
Unless us southern softies are just tougher lol
I'd argue there are many reasons combining at the same time such as affluence, population density, ethnicity, employment structure, university locations and no doubt many others. Looking for one single reason is impossible.