funkycoldmedina
Newbie
ACE2 receptors btw are how the virus get into the lung cells, replicate and then burst out.Children have less ACE2 receptors on their lung cells compared to adults. Men have more than women hence why more men are succumbing.
ACE2 receptors btw are how the virus get into the lung cells, replicate and then burst out.Children have less ACE2 receptors on their lung cells compared to adults. Men have more than women hence why more men are succumbing.
If you read what I copied it specifically mentions children under 10, your link doesn’t seperate ages.Unfortunately I'm not sure this is true the Germans have looked at viral loads in children and found them the same as adults and the presumption is that their infectivity is the same.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...-scientists-caution-against-reopening-schools
ACE2 receptors btw are how the virus get into the lung cells, replicate and then burst out.
They don’t have to, but it certainly helps limit the spread if they have it and don’t know they do.why do people have to wear gloves and masks?
why do people have to wear gloves and masks?
that's if people peel them off. the amount of people I have seen arrive at the supermarket wearing gloves, do their shopping and then drive home wearing the same pair! omgImagine you're working in ITU and the person you're dealing with imparts 10,000,000 bugs onto your gloves. When you peel them off, you peel off the thick end of 10,000,000. Then wash your hands.
999 people out of 1000 wash off all the bugs. Some might leave 500 bugs. 1 person gets it.
If you don't wear the gloves you increase the risk. Its a numbers thing - BTW, that's a very simplistic way for me to explain it. There'll be someone out there who can give you better numbers.
For masks its the aerosol thing but similarly, when you take the mask off you remove most of the bugs. Shower, and you remove the rest.
EDIT: oops, Paul's just replied.
that's if people peel them off. the amount of people I have seen arrive at the supermarket wearing gloves, do their shopping and then drive home wearing the same pair! omg
Having fewer receptors is not the same as not being able to access the cell.The receptor difference between men and women may be an interesting hypothesis it has not as far as I have seen been accepted as fact.Children have less ACE2 receptors on their lung cells compared to adults. Men have more than women hence why more men are succumbing.
If you read the linked publication it covers all ages including under 10'sIf you read what I copied it specifically mentions children under 10, your link doesn’t seperate ages.
I did, very generic article, no breakdown by age and my initial post did say:If you read the linked publication it covers all ages including under 10's
that's if people peel them off. the amount of people I have seen arrive at the supermarket wearing gloves, do their shopping and then drive home wearing the same pair! omg
They don’t have to, but it certainly helps limit the spread if they have it and don’t know they do.
Update:
PM just stated that SAGE believes face coverings will be useful for both epidemioligal reasons and giving people confidence when they go about their business.
If I have Covid-19 and I’m unaware I have it, but wear gloves and a face mask when I’m out then I am reducing the risk of me spreading it.G
However gloves have been proven to be worse at spreading the virus than skin. People don't use them correctly. So it's more harmful in the main for people to use gloves than to just wash their hands when they get home
I personally use gloves , but carry hand gel in the car so soon as their off I clean my hands to limit the spread Further
Been a few doctors sharing videos about it
like you I've done many courses. gloves go on clean hands. if you take them off correctly you get zero contamination. however, during training they put uv dye on our gloves. the task was to remove them without transference. the first glove is easy. second not so much.I drive home with them on. But there again I've done plenty of Control of Infection lectures to know what I should be doing. Think about it...….... you come out of the supermarket, potentially, with 'dirty' hands. You peel the gloves off, and still have some 'dirt' on them because you still haven't washed your hands. You then transfer that 'dirt' onto the steering wheel/door handles/switches. Keep your gloves on to protect yourself. Also, for whatever reason, it makes you less likely to touch your face. When you get home, 'doff' your gear, clean the car, then get a bloody good wash.
Would you work with rough lumber without gloves? No. Just because you can't see the problem doesn't mean it isn't there.
I was referring to the scientific paper to which the article links where they very specifically do breakdown by age.I did, very generic article, no breakdown by age .
like you I've done many courses. gloves go on clean hands. if you take them off correctly you get zero contamination. however, during training they put uv dye on our gloves. the task was to remove them without transference. the first glove is easy. second not so much.
the secret is to double glove
Very true, my post did come across as fact and it indeed is a hypothesis.Having fewer receptors is not the same as not being able to access the cell.The receptor difference between men and women may be an interesting hypothesis it has not as far as I have seen been accepted as fact.
I drive home with them on. But there again I've done plenty of Control of Infection lectures to know what I should be doing. Think about it...….... you come out of the supermarket, potentially, with 'dirty' hands. You peel the gloves off, and still have some 'dirt' on them because you still haven't washed your hands. You then transfer that 'dirt' onto the steering wheel/door handles/switches. Keep your gloves on to protect yourself. Also, for whatever reason, it makes you less likely to touch your face. When you get home, 'doff' your gear, clean the car, then get a bloody good wash.
Would you work with rough lumber without gloves? No. Just because you can't see the problem doesn't mean it isn't there.
Maybe, though viral shedding appears to be the same across all ages.Very true, my post did come across as fact and it indeed is a hypothesis.
With regard kids and the receptor maybe it's the initial cell loading which is reduced because there are less access point for the virus so the immune system has a chance to produce an antibody rather than the cytokine storm we see in some adults?
I'm one level bellow a paramedic. my primary reason for double gloving is so you can move from one patient to another with ease. it's also hugely effective at some what diluting\ allowing for error when de-gloving. if I'm removing gloves with covid on them it's nice to know i have a second chance when undressing. also, I'm delivering food to covid people so I'm fully aware of guidance regarding PPE and why it's in placeDouble gloving is about rips, tears and perforations. There is a process for taking off the double gloves but there is still a contamination issue, though reduced. 95% of the reason for double gloving isn't it gives you better protection from the virus in front of you, its about rips, tears and perforations.
Bit blunt but not meant to offend, I wouldn't tell you how to fight a fire. Seeing your post on gloves boils my pee. You're fireman with some knowledge of PPE but in this instance its only some knowledge. If someone says wear the PPE don't question it.