Italian outcast
Hacker
I found myself yesterday contemplating the argument of an anti-vacc'er - that all who wish to be vaccinated will (in time) be vaccinated and that will 'protect' them from infection from those who do not want to be vaccinated and who subsequently are infected by the virus. Yes the transition period to when all who want to be vaccinated are vaccinated will be problematic indeed - but that period is perhaps subject to different considerations to when all are vaccinated who want to be vaccinated.
But of course I can then not see past the load imposed on the NHS of all those not vaccinated and becoming ill with Covid-19. Despite what I might want I feel that we cannot simply say - 'tough' - as that way lies telling smokers, drinkers - and even then perhaps such as reckless swimmers, climbers etc - 'tough.
The aim is not to vaccinate everyone - at first the most essential staff (healthcare/carers) and the most vulnerable to effects of infection..then lets see (probably over 50s then stop at that) - personally i reckon it will be essential
Remember with a vaccine policy we do aim to generate herd immunity - through safer vaccination rather than through unrestrained and dangerous natural infection
As for anti-vaxxers - or broader vaccine hesitancy - that has to be accepted - there will be no mandate - it will be an individual choice
In general healthcare and healthcare staff never say tough - that way lies puritanical madness - nearly every disease and early death can have a 'tough' applied to it in some way - so as you say we show compassion and at our worst reserve judgement