Appendix II says that club manufacturers 'should' submit a sample club for testing, so it is not absolutely compulsory, but there is a risk that the club could subsequently found to be non-conforming.
If I had the ways and means of making my own golf club in my garage. Would I have to have it passed by the r&a before using it in a comp?
With clubs that are on general sale we don't have to worry about conformity as the Manufacturers have done the work for us. They wouldn't sell a product that doesn't conform without identifying it clearly
Drivers with excessive COR's. Irons with illegal grooves. Putters with non-conforming heads or grips.Which clubs have been released by manufacturers that are non conforming ?
Drivers with excessive COR's. Irons with illegal grooves. Putters with non-conforming heads or grips.
Which clubs have been released by manufacturers that are non conforming ?
And those exact clubs are ?
The shaft also has to conform in being straight and symmetrical in cross section and bending properties, as does the grip. However the shaft in any test club is almost certainly going to conform.On the OP, I would havd thought that its the head that goes for conformity approval rather than the whole club (due to the fact you can pretty much play any shaft you like in a head) and therefore the demo club is the same club as the retail version (or what woukd be the point in testing it if you were buying a different product?), the rules dont differentiate how a club is attached, save that it doesnt come loose. So whether its screwed or glued surely the head is conforming as long as its been deemed so.
The shaft also has to conform in being straight and symmetrical in cross section and bending properties, as does the grip. However the shaft in any test club is almost certainly going to conform.