Italian outcast
Hacker
The statement was "Call it halved in 3 and walk on"
That implies both players agreed that were in the hole and finished in 3 shots - gross
Surely the issue is the failure to account for the stroke given - which is not part of the 'mutual concession statement and agreement'
That this was not accounted for in the match-score after the hole is a different matter - is it not
Or am I missing something?
That implies both players agreed that were in the hole and finished in 3 shots - gross
Surely the issue is the failure to account for the stroke given - which is not part of the 'mutual concession statement and agreement'
That this was not accounted for in the match-score after the hole is a different matter - is it not
Or am I missing something?