Renault are effectively admitting that the result of the Singapore Grand Prix was fixed and are hoping the FIA will be lenient with them now that Briatore and Symonds are no longer part of the team.
I don't think it will make any difference. The fact that Piquet was asked to deliberately crash is damming and will in my view see them expelled next season. However that said I can then see them appealling and being able to race while that is investigated...... you know the rest in F1
So have I got this right? They vigourously deny everything and threaten to sue, until they see the evidence against them, conduct an internal witch hunt, fold their defence and admit they did it, sack people and hope the punishment will be reduced.
"how can you take away the jobs of 500 workers because of the miscounduct of 2 men, men who have been removed from their positions with immediate effect"
Cant see them getting thrown out of the sport though, O think they will be banned from earning constructors points at worse.
Also, this brings another question. Any owner of a football club must be "fit & proper" to do so. Bear in mind that briatore owns QPR football club along with ecclestone and mittal so where does that leave briatore in that respect?
And to think that Briatore was instrumental in the break away F1 ramblings that went on at Silverstone. Fancied himself a bit as the next Max and Bernie!!
I do feel sorry for young Piquet though. I can't imagine the presure he was under from Briatore to do this. Despite what the nippers own thoughts about it were, I really think that he was painted into a corner that he couldn't get out of.
I have had a thought. Was Briatore in charge of Benetton when Schumacher crashed into Damon Hill in 94 or 95 after he'd damaged his car and it looked like Hill would win the world championship ?
I have had this theory in my head for a couple of days but havn't seen any mention of the possible meaning into it !!