• We'd like to take this opportunity to wish you a Happy Holidays and a very Merry Christmas from all at Golf Monthly. Thank you for sharing your 2025 with us!

Brexit - or Article 50: the Phoenix!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Are you sure it wasn't more a bit of a litmus test for his own 'new' MPs (Speaker & HoC) to check he could get the new stuff through unhindered in the next 12 months?
Again...irrelevant!

And there's 'better' ways for him to get that message across!
 
Your Sig applies!

How (or even Why!) he did it is irrelevant; simply the fact that he did it demonstrates the 'PR only' nature such laws will now have!
No need for the sarcasm. Lets keep it adult.
Of course its not irrevelant, he did what he was forced to do by his oponents passing the Benn act, you cant honestly blame him for not carrying out his plan.
 
Reported last night, a comment by Michael Gove. The workers rights element of the WA “May be omitted in favour of a ‘home grown‘ policy.”

That’ll go down well, especially in the constituencies recently won from Labour.
 
Reported last night, a comment by Michael Gove. The workers rights element of the WA “May be omitted in favour of a ‘home grown‘ policy.”

That’ll go down well, especially in the constituencies recently won from Labour.
I'd imagine by voting Tory workers rights were not high on the list, so it will make little difference....:(
 
No need for the sarcasm. Lets keep it adult.
Of course its not irrevelant, he did what he was forced to do by his oponents passing the Benn act, you cant honestly blame him for not carrying out his plan.
It's irrelevant to the specific point I made, which you replied to!
I repeat...
How (or even Why!) he did it is irrelevant; simply the fact that he did it demonstrates the 'PR only' nature such laws will now have!

Of course, his action had relevance to what he was trying to achieve, but that's completely separate to the point I was making in the post you quoted!
 
...
I assume you reply with 'Fact' or is it just your opinion...
I believe (so simply my opinion) that reminding them of the action he has taken against 'rebels' in the past would be the most effective method.

Btw (and completely unrelated to your post..). You don't seem to have fulfilled your (earning) potential as much as others in your 'trade' have! https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-50834994
 
Last edited:
It's irrelevant to the specific point I made, which you replied to!
I repeat...
How (or even Why!) he did it is irrelevant; simply the fact that he did it demonstrates the 'PR only' nature such laws will now have!

Of course, his action had relevance to what he was trying to achieve, but that's completely separate to the point I was making in the post you quoted!
Thats a better reply.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top