looks like driving off a cliff edge isn't the thing to make the £ stronger, dropped again back to pre election levels.Why do you spout garbage all the time? FTSE at record high and pound at a 12 month high.
looks like driving off a cliff edge isn't the thing to make the £ stronger, dropped again back to pre election levels.Why do you spout garbage all the time? FTSE at record high and pound at a 12 month high.
Again...irrelevant!Are you sure it wasn't more a bit of a litmus test for his own 'new' MPs (Speaker & HoC) to check he could get the new stuff through unhindered in the next 12 months?
Again...irrelevant!
And there's 'better' ways for him to get that message across!
Who really cares? Let’s watch what happens instead of second guessing everything!
No their not, you blew it when you said friend
Of course we should be worried, but none of this should come as a surprise.https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...ronment-climate-change-election-a9248611.html
Scaremongering or something to worry about?
No need for the sarcasm. Lets keep it adult.Your Sig applies!
How (or even Why!) he did it is irrelevant; simply the fact that he did it demonstrates the 'PR only' nature such laws will now have!
Just terrible as opposed to absolutely terrible.
Sweet.
I'd imagine by voting Tory workers rights were not high on the list, so it will make little difference....Reported last night, a comment by Michael Gove. The workers rights element of the WA “May be omitted in favour of a ‘home grown‘ policy.”
That’ll go down well, especially in the constituencies recently won from Labour.
looks like driving off a cliff edge isn't the thing to make the £ stronger, dropped again back to pre election levels.
I would tell them the management fee was covered then .. easy lifersI'm sure a few hedge funds made a packet buying or shorting the pound or whatever the hell they do. And as we know, that is the main priority.
It's irrelevant to the specific point I made, which you replied to!No need for the sarcasm. Lets keep it adult.
Of course its not irrevelant, he did what he was forced to do by his oponents passing the Benn act, you cant honestly blame him for not carrying out his plan.
It’s aimed at you too
This post is typical of the sort of remark we are clamping down on.
Please note
do us all a favour - have a view, express some evidence to back it but stop trolling
I believe (so simply my opinion) that reminding them of the action he has taken against 'rebels' in the past would be the most effective method....
I assume you reply with 'Fact' or is it just your opinion...
Why?do us all a favour - have a view, express some evidence to back it but stop trolling
Thats a better reply.It's irrelevant to the specific point I made, which you replied to!
I repeat...
How (or even Why!) he did it is irrelevant; simply the fact that he did it demonstrates the 'PR only' nature such laws will now have!
Of course, his action had relevance to what he was trying to achieve, but that's completely separate to the point I was making in the post you quoted!
Yes, it does seem like backtracking.Reported last night, a comment by Michael Gove. The workers rights element of the WA “May be omitted in favour of a ‘home grown‘ policy.”
That’ll go down well, especially in the constituencies recently won from Labour.