Brexit - or Article 50: the Phoenix!

Status
Not open for further replies.
???? Did you not see the Labour MP's who voted againt their leader? There was only 2! How many Labour constituancies votes out?
The entire premise that you can equate/define 'the number following their conscience' to/as 'the number voting against their Leader' and, by implication, 'the number NOT following their conscience' as 'the number NOT voting against their leader' is Twaddle!
 
I voted to Leave, I never ever voted to Leave with No Deal, the Leave campaign also said we’d have a deal.
...
That question/option was not on the voting paper!
Did you believe the rest of their statements too? If so, more fool you!
1 Party has dealt with the EU, they have never been joined up since TM started the negotiations.
..
If you think that would work, then....well, I've no unoffensive words to describe that!
If Parliament had voted for her deal the same way they defeated vote of no confidence we’d be out.

Yes it may of been a bad deal, but we’d be out.
Remember HER words...No Deal is better than a BAD Deal!

And it was/is a bad deal because we wouldn't be 'out' - because of the Backstop arrangements!
 
It’s a good job we (the people on here) are not in charge by some of the arguments.
Lots have merit ,lots don’t. On both sides .
But you can see by just our discussion that this is very difficult to sort out.

I don’t know the answer ,and don’t know anyone who does!
It’s a mess . To many lies, half truths, there is no trust in the system.

If you have to change the law to get a political outcome you are doing it very wrong imo.
 
Yes I did, I trusted that Leave would win and we’d leave with a deal.
Every time Cameron opened his mouth he was dismissed and accussed of “project fear” are you saying he was right all along?
You made at least 1 bad decision about who/what to trust then, though there was plenty of evidence that they were untrustworthy!
On that matter, Cameron WAS right!
 
Last edited:
It’s a good job we (the people on here) are not in charge by some of the arguments.
Lots have merit ,lots don’t. On both sides .
But you can see by just our discussion that this is very difficult to sort out.

I don’t know the answer ,and don’t know anyone who does!
It’s a mess . To many lies, half truths, there is no trust in the system.

If you have to change the law to get a political outcome you are doing it very wrong imo.

I agree with all apart from your last sentence.

The Fixed Term Parliament Act; the current scenario of the Tories losing control of Parliament but unable to call an election means the UK has a puppet government, at the beck and call of which ever parties can cobble together whatever they can agree on and push through.

For example, and lets come away from the current mess, if the other parties proposed and created a law that saw the implementation of a new social care bill. Yes it might well be needed but you now have a new law without looking at affordability. Where's the budget?

And where's the accountability? Labour/LibDem alliance push something through but who takes responsibility for it?
 
That question/option was not on the voting paper!
Did you believe the rest of their statements too? If so, more fool you!

If you think that would work, then....well, I've no unoffensive words to describe that!

Remember HER words...No Deal is better than a BAD Deal!

And it was/is a bad deal because we wouldn't be 'out' - because of the Backstop arrangements!
Twaddle
 
Still don’t like hard cold facts I see.:rolleyes:
What facts are those? You pontificating and telling me what I should and shouldn’t believe or think.
I’d rather stick a pineapple up me @r&£ than take advice from you.
 
Going off at a bit of a tangent, here's one to consider about who doesn't and who does support a No Deal. In the Beeb's own words, 3/4 of Remainers oppose a No Deal, and almost 3/4 of Leavers don't have a problem with No Deal.

That isn't hard to understand at all.

But here's the question; if 3/4 of Remainers oppose a No Deal, and almost 3/4 of Leavers don't oppose a No Deal, why does the graphic on the Beeb's website say the majority of people oppose No Deal?

We know there were more Leavers than Remainers, therefore 3/4 of Leavers is more than 3/4 of Remainers. And its not too difficult to perceive that 3/4 of a bigger number is bigger than 3/4 of a smaller number. Why does the Beeb's graphic suggest otherwise? There will be a little wriggle room in the calculation but... why do the numbers in the graph add up to 103%.

I'm inclined to think I've missed something.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top