It is the UK that is leaving the EU - not the other way around - and the EU are protecting (as best they see it) the best interests of the EU27 and the GF Agreement. The EU are at fault for not bowing to the wishes of the UK? The EU did not set down red lines following the referendum. The EU's constraints were already there - there for all to see - and we knew about them all along. The UK then set out Red Lines that were immediately inconsistent with what was known about the EU's constraints. And so at that point many said we'd end up with No Deal.
Meanwhile Johnson removes two key negotiable aspects of the backstop - these aspects being what those opposed to the Backstop were most concerned about - that the back stop was not time-limited and that EU had to agree to any solution for the UK to be able to exit it.
Have we now reached a situation where Larry the Cat speaks more sense than the 2 people wanting to be the next PM? Funny old world.
Can you, or Larry the Cat, point us to the proof of the costs, or is this just more speculation?
Assume Larry is referring to this? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-49027889
The article, the third paragraph of which states that the scenario is based on assumptions; that article?
Hammond's (Treasury) £90Bn specifies 'by 2035'. An incredibly long term, even for 'planners'. So not really realistic imo! There's no 'term' that I can see (happy to be informed of one) for the £30Bn estimate.Earlier this month Philip Hammond said the cost would be £90bn. Hell of a difference between £30bn and £90bn. The hysteria is ramping up...
Thats right, he did and it was Twaddle 😉Both sides pluck those numbers out of the air. Total guess work and close to worthless. Didn't Osborne come out with similar guff for what would happen post vote?
Hammonds prediction is over 15 years, not per year. However, the treasuries form on predictions is not exactly bulletproof.Assume Larry is referring to this? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-49027889
Everything is something.
Hammond's (Treasury) £90Bn specifies 'by 2035'. An incredibly long term, even for 'planners'. So not really realistic imo! There's no 'term' that I can see (happy to be informed of one) for the £30Bn estimate.
More 'disinformation' from Bojo though.... His Kipper story appears to be complete twaddle - for a couple of reasons! https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-49030873