• Thank you all very much for sharing your time with us in 2025. We hope you all have a safe and happy 2026!

Brexit - or Article 50: the Phoenix!

Status
Not open for further replies.
So they are ignoring the voice if the people. If we agree that the type of brexit was not specified then they have blocked Brexit happening next week because it is not the Brexit they want.
They are still 'defying the will of the people' though!

The type of Brexit required was, quite sensibly, not asked!
 
They are still 'defying the will of the people' though!

The type of Brexit required was, quite sensibly, not asked!

Exactly. How on earth could a referendum ask questions with 'options' for leaving when you are about to enter discussions on how to separate and how to deal in the future. The whole issue has been frustrated by the pseudo pretence that you can discuss separation without taking any cognizance of what you BOTH want for the future.

If we'd had discussed the future mutual advantages to the UK and EU of agreed alignments in some areas and how we could develop systems we could trust to 'police' each other the daft bit about Ireland and a 'backstop' contingency would have been addressed in a mature way.
 
So they are ignoring the voice if the people. If we agree that the type of brexit was not specified then they have blocked Brexit happening next week because it is not the Brexit they want.

By their definition, May's deal is NOT Brexit!
 
And also All Labour voters up North who voted out ( and eee bye gum there were a lot of them) who haven't had their wishes met should vote...er er. Nige! Nige! are you starting that party of your's mate?

Is that the one where the leader has just resigned due to anti Islamic posts.
Remind me again ,why did Nigel leave UKIP to join them [whatever they are called].
 
By their definition, May's deal is NOT Brexit!
But who is to say that is right. By not defining brexit in the original vote you now have a massive grey area and hence the problems. To parts of the tory party anything less than a no deal brexit is not brexit. Which is the will of the people?
 
Last edited:
But who is to say that is right...
It matters (to them) not a jot! They have their definition - which I actually agree with, if not their intransgence of allowing a 'phased implimentation'
...By not defining brexit in the original vote you now have a massive grey area and hence the problems. To parts of the tory party anything less than a no deal brexit is not brexit...
That was never gouing to happen!
...Which is the will of the people?...
The question was, effectively, 'Do we Leave or do we Stay'! And the Leave side won, therefore anything other than 'Leave' is not 'the will of the people! Now HOW we leave was always up for negotiation!
 
It matters (to them) not a jot! They have their definition - which I actually agree with, if not their intransgence of allowing a 'phased implimentation'

That was never gouing to happen!

The question was, effectively, 'Do we Leave or do we Stay'! And the Leave side won, therefore anything other than 'Leave' is not 'the will of the people! Now HOW we leave was always up for negotiation!
Which is why leave needed defining. What remaining ties with europe count as not leaving.
 
Which is why leave needed defining. What remaining ties with europe count as not leaving.

How do you define something that is not within your gift to unilaterally define as it is to be subject to the outcome of future discussions?
 
How do you define something that is not within your gift to unilaterally define as it is to be subject to the outcome of future discussions?
In the same way that parliament is discussing options not on the table. For something as far reaching as this you need clarity and there is none. Now it cannot be ascertained who voted wanting or expecting a no deal and who voted based on the promised, easily negotiated exit agreement. With no definition who can say what the will of the people is as it is open to massive levels of interpretation
 
They are still 'defying the will of the people' though!

The type of Brexit required was, quite sensibly, not asked!

Agree... but may i ask.. what specifically is the will of the people? Other than 'we want to leave', the will of the people is a rainbow of wills - Norway, Canada, Hard, Semi-Soft, Soft, Swiss, WTO, MFN , i-want-2-change-my-mind, Backstop, No-Backstop, Hard Border, No Border, No Immigration, Single Market, No Single Market, etc etc.

Are you able to summarise in 1 sentence the Will of the people that should be implemented and therefore should be part of the Deal/WA.

As far as blaming Remainers - their 'Will' has been singular since Day 1.

Answer on a postcard please -- and no blaming others. ;)

(I have also added a smiley in case a Leaver gets offended)
 
I disagree, if enough people want the question asked again then it would be undemocratic not to do so. The electorate can change its mind. If the will of the people is still to leave, leave will clearly win so no issue there

No problem, it is your DEMOCRATIC right to be wrong.
 
They are still 'defying the will of the people' though!

The type of Brexit required was, quite sensibly, not asked!

Because the deal that is best, the EU want to charge us for. So if a company said to you we will charge you to do business with us. as well as charge you for our goods, would you say ok and shell out the money or look for a better deal?
 
Because the deal that is best, the EU want to charge us for. So if a company said to you we will charge you to do business with us. as well as charge you for our goods, would you say ok and shell out the money or look for a better deal?
Actually the payments are based on financial promises made by the uk that already existed. To leave and not honor those commitments will leave years of litigation at a cost of millions and a serious impact on the uks ability to borrow globally.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top