Swinglowandslow
Well-known member
The bar could hardly be set any lower...![]()
Every little chance you get.
you and your sense of fair play have been quite accurately described.
The bar could hardly be set any lower...![]()
you'll have noted what I subsequently said about Boris vs Corbyn...besides - this a thread about Johnson - so what's the grouse? And what's this about 'fair play' - Johnson is a deceitful liar...and that's not an opinion - it's a demonstrable fact.Every little chance you get.
you and your sense of fair play have been quite accurately described.
The system we have is that WE vote for the MP to represent us and not a vote for a PM.Same as ??
Actually the American electorate didn't vote for Trump - they voted for Clinton by quite some margin (2.87million votes) - but Trump won the Electoral College. Plus the representatives from each state comprising the Electoral College don't necessarily have to vote for the candidate who won their state.We didnt vote for the Prime Minister but the Americans did for their President
The system we have is that WE vote for the MP to represent us and not a vote for a PM.
That's the point isn't it, we vote for our MP and/or preferred party , the US voters are voting for their leader.
More US voters voted for Clinton than Trump in 2016.
That's a quirk of their system, my point was that the US vote for their president we vote for our MP
Pretty big quirk!! The US voters voted for Clinton and they got Trump...
But that’s the issue, in our system we can put a donkey in rosette in a safe seat and then end up with it as PM as WE have no say in it.That's the point isn't it, we vote for our MP and/or preferred party , the US voters are voting for their leader.
But that’s the issue, in our system we can put a donkey in rosette in a safe seat and then end up with it as PM as WE have no say in it.
At least with Trump every voter had a choice.
But that’s the issue, in our system we can put a donkey in rosette in a safe seat and then end up with it as PM as WE have no say in it.
At least with Trump every voter had a choice.
But that's the way many political elections work without proportional representation.Pretty big quirk!! The US voters voted for Clinton and they got Trump...
It goes back to the standard of our MP’s and what we want as a Nation.Would you prefer to choose a Prime Minister even though he might not represent the party in power?
But that’s the issue, in our system we can put a donkey in rosette in a safe seat and then end up with it as PM as WE have no say in it.
At least with Trump every voter had a choice.
It goes back to the standard of our MP’s and what we want as a Nation.
PM should always come from the Party in power.
But it's not unlike our FPTP system. We vote for local MPs and the number of them is what creates Government not the overall number of votes.Every voter always has a choice, it is the same in the UK, if voters don't liked the leadership choice you won't win, look at Corbyn and labour.
Anyone that thinks the American system is better than ours and that someone getting 2.8 million less votes is a deserved winner, well what can you say....
Never suggested the US system is better, just simply the fact the only people who have a say in who the actual PM in this Country is are those in that MP’s constituencey and as stated they tend to be in the safest of safe seats.Every voter always has a choice, it is the same in the UK, if voters don't liked the leadership choice you won't win, look at Corbyn and labour.
Anyone that thinks the American system is better than ours and that someone getting 2.8 million less votes is a deserved winner, well what can you say....
No it’s not Chris, many times this Country has ended up with PM’s who were not in charge when the election was called and we’ve had good and bad PM’s from all parties.And for that reason we dont choose the PM and, typically those who don't vote for a particular party don't tend to like the PM
No it’s not Chris, many times this Country has ended up with PM’s who were not in charge when the election was called and we’ve had good and bad PM’s from all parties.
Not all points of view boil down to who you voted for.