Annual Review

[Deleted member 15344]

Not sure how you can say that without knowing the results of other comps that the player may have played in.

He is already at 5.7 - an annual review will only take him down to 5.5 clubs aren't allowed to take him any lower. So they won't take him down .2 because they also deal in full shots

 

[Old Skier]

He is already at 5.7 - an annual review will only take him down to 5.5 clubs aren't allowed to take him any lower. So they won't take him down .2 because they also deal in full shots

Ah, seen

 

[rulefan]

He is already at 5.7 - an annual review will only take him down to 5.5 clubs aren't allowed to take him any lower. So they won't take him down .2 because they also deal in full shots

Where do you get 5.7 from? The player record shows 8.5.

 

[rulefan]

Junior

Unless my arithmetic is wrong it looks as if you may be recommended for a cut, probably of 1 stroke.

 

[ger147]

Where do you get 5.7 from? The player record shows 8.5.

Different player - that was a reply to Patrick148.

 

[Junior]

Junior

Unless my arithmetic is wrong it looks as if you may be recommended for a cut, probably of 1 stroke.

Excellent , thanks !! I'll whisper in the h/cap sec's ear either way and ask him what our computer says !!

 

[pbrown7582]

Excellent , thanks !! I'll whisper in the h/cap sec's ear either way and ask him what our computer says !!

plain brown envelope will probably help too. :lol:

 

[BTatHome]

Have never been included in previous annual review discussion (competition results have sorted out my handicap pretty well).

The following is this years handicap graph .....



not exactly what I wanted to achieve, and the guys on our handicap committee would laugh any consideration of review out of the room

 

[One Planer]

I posted this on a thread earlier in the year.

Here's my qualifying results for the season just gone:

Foxholer says I should be flagged, hopefully just for the 1 shot :thup:

 

[Old Skier]

Have never been included in previous annual review discussion (competition results have sorted out my handicap pretty well).

The following is this years handicap graph .....

View attachment 8270

not exactly what I wanted to achieve, and the guys on our handicap committee would laugh any consideration of review out of the room

You can go up as well as down

 

[pbrown7582]

You can go up as well as down

thats an issue i hope to avoid! consistantly put in some pretty poor scores this year so hopefully i will sneak under the radar........

 

[AmandaJR]

This is kind of confusing but having crunched the numbers I think I've worked out my average versus the expected. I averaged 36.63 and the expected is 39.96. So, whilst there is a differential of more than -3, I received a cut of 1.8 (2 playing shots) through the season so am assuming I won't be flagged in the AR for a cut??

 

[rulefan]

Sounds about right.

 

[rosecott]

This is kind of confusing but having crunched the numbers I think I've worked out my average versus the expected. I averaged 36.63 and the expected is 39.96. So, whilst there is a differential of more than -3, I received a cut of 1.8 (2 playing shots) through the season so am assuming I won't be flagged in the AR for a cut??

From my reading of AR reports, a -3.33 would produce a suggested 1 stroke reduction.

 

[AmandaJR]

From my reading of AR reports, a -3.33 would produce a suggested 1 stroke reduction.

That would be very nice and appropriate as I'm scoring well still off 10 BUT my big cut came late in the season so not sure if that would prohibit an AR cut?

 

[rosecott]

That would be very nice and appropriate as I'm scoring well still off 10 BUT my big cut came late in the season so not sure if that would prohibit an AR cut?

Keep hoping - the AR looks at the year as a whole, not the recent past.

 

[One Planer]

Can supplementary cards be used in the Annual review process or is it competition scores only?

 

[rulefan]

It uses all Qualifying Scores.

 

[One Planer]

It uses all Qualifying Scores.

That'll be a big, fat no then

 

[AmandaJR]

That'll be a big, fat no then

I read it as a big fat yes as supps ARE qualifiers...