HomerJSimpson
Hall of Famer
Its an obscene amount of money considering the state of the health service and schools across the UK. However that's deemed the market price and there shows no sign of demand for the PL games diminishing
Its an obscene amount of money considering the state of the health service and schools across the UK. However that's deemed the market price and there shows no sign of demand for the PL games diminishing
Wish more would would do this, football is so out of touch it's frightening. Really needs to come back down to earth. Only people losing out are the fans so they are the only ones who can change it by boycotting games and sky.Well neither will be getting any money from me. After 30+ years of being an avid football fan, I'm finally ready to admit that I no longer care about the game at the top level. In future, I'll be spending my football time in the Non-Leagues and the Junior game.
Having been part of a bid from my local Village team to secure funding from the FA to finance a small football/rugby facility that will be a huge benefit to the community, and seeing the struggle to gain even a minor cash injection. There was a general feeling of disgust today when this was announced.
Wish more would would do this, football is so out of touch it's frightening. Really needs to come back down to earth. Only people losing out are the fans so they are the only ones who can change it by boycotting games and sky.
If all the money was taken out it would still be the same spectacle it is now as the same players would play for £5000 a week instead of £100000 they get now, as what else would they do?
Don't know how he gets by on that poor lad. But how is it ever going to change? The men who set the rules, ie Fifa and the FA etc profit just as much as the players as the more money that is in football the more they can syphon off it, so its a vicious circle that is corrupt and the fans are always going to lose out.Was talking to my mate the other day,he said he'd read that Paul Pogba was ONLY on £23k pw.
The fact that we were talking about a young player on such an obscene amount of money as if he was on minimum wage just shows how out of touch football is.
Was talking to my mate the other day,he said he'd read that Paul Pogba was ONLY on £23k pw.
The fact that we were talking about a young player on such an obscene amount of money as if he was on minimum wage just shows how out of touch football is.
Think with golf being an individual sport it's more deserved, as there is nowhere to hide behind a team, where as football there are hundreds of average footballers picking up obscene amounts.And how much is rory on per week from nike? Its not only football.............
And how much is rory on per week from nike? Its not only football.............
Personally, I don't think us punters will see prices increase with Sky, other than inflationary. They have a HUGE football budget (Thierry Henry on £4m a year anyone?!?!) which is about to have a huge hole in it when they lose Champs League next season. To many, their 'product' will therefore be less valuable. They simply couldn't afford to lose any of their 5 packages and that's reflected in the ridiculous price they paid yesterday.
You have to go back to the main reason for why BT has a Sport channel in the first place. Sky were eating their customers left, right and center through their bundled offering (broadband, talk, TV) - the sharp decline in this lucrative market for BT was incredible - they really had to act and compete with Sky where it would hurt them most - Sport. BT Sport is a massive loss leader from them, they don't ever see it as a profit making arm of the business, but by offering 'free' Prem football they gambled on halting and reversing the trend.
Having then overpaid for Champions League for next 3 seasons, there are some VERY worried people @ BT Sport sweating on the outcome of the Top4 this year. They are desperate for Man United to get there, and ideally Liverpool as well (although United and Arsenal wouldn't be bad). For Champions League group games, United attract 20x more viewers than City and 10x more than Chelsea. I'd think Southampton qualifying would be a complete nightmare!! If United make Top4, they will see more subscribers, advertisers etc pile in. Without them, they're in significant bother!
FWIW, I think BT are likely to be putting prices up for next season, or at the very least remodelling the 'free' access to its broadband customers. I'd be surprised if Sky prices were to go up.
The next stage will be that 5 billion is not enough for some and the big clubs will want their own deals or a bigger slice of the pie. I can even see the premier league paying to reduce the number of teams relegated or insist on playoffs between the promoted abd relegated teams. One thing is for sure, any sum of money, however large, is never enough
Football agents will be licking their lips.The next stage will be that 5 billion is not enough for some and the big clubs will want their own deals or a bigger slice of the pie. I can even see the premier league paying to reduce the number of teams relegated or insist on playoffs between the promoted abd relegated teams. One thing is for sure, any sum of money, however large, is never enough
Thing is, sky actually could survive without the sport. Across sky 1, sky Atlantic and Living they have some of the best tv available. There is little on terrestrial TV to compete.
But how many do you think just get Sky for the sport - the telly shows etc can be got on DVD
how much are the latest box sets to buy on DVD & how long would it take you to watch?