That’s dodging the point, Kane had the chance to square to Sterling in the SF and went for goal, as an example, no one is saying Sterling is better than Kane, it’s the double standard, when Kane is criticised people drop back to his PL record or he might be carrying an injury or he never stopped running.
Sadly, by Kane’s standard he didn’t have a great World Cup, the whole team iver achieved and regardless of his 3 penalties and a lucky deflection for whatever reason he didn’t get or create the chances he does in the PL.
Im not dodging a thing. Kane scored 6 goals, call em tap ins, lucky anything else. He scored 6 and is going to win the golden boot. To make out that is a bad World Cup, and then still claim england did well, which some have is imo laughable.
I as an england fan, would never complain that Kane chose to shot instead of squaring to Sterling because Sterling is a poor finisher and I’d fancy Kane’s chances more often than not.
I dont think kane was injured, I think he was starved of service. He usually has Erickson setting him up, this time it was Sterling. Sterling does a job in the pl and got in good positions for himself this World Cup. But, he isn’t the player that’ll usually thread a ball.
Imo anyone who thinks Kane’s performances were no better than Sterling’s is entitled to their opinion, but I find it hard to understand it.