D
Deleted member 15344
Guest
I wouldn't go quite that far!!
What sort of people do you think aren't entitled to one mate ?
I wouldn't go quite that far!!
mate im going to ask you very nicely please never post on one of my threads ever again you do not play golf if you think that the later part of you statement to true, GOODBYE
mate im going to ask you very nicely please never post on one of my threads ever again you do not play golf if you think that the later part of you statement to true, GOODBYE
I think that anything up to 5 is low and from 6-9 is mid and anything in double figures his high and anyone over 18 has no real intention of playing the game as a sport but more of a way of getting exercise with their mates and don't bother about holding up other golfers on the course.
What sort of people do you think aren't entitled to one mate ?
Low - 9 and under
Mid 10-18
High 19 and over
IMO I don't consider 9 and under as low, I guess that cat 1,2&3 are about ok as a division. The different question is where does a happy hacker become a good golfer, I think when you are better than scratch
Jesus Christ, I accept that people are entitled to their opinion, but are you for real? Anyone that is not single figures is a high handicapper? Do you realise that the average handicap is somewhere in the mid teens, so going on your philosophy most golfers are high handicappers!
Do you know the average handicap of the golfer in the uk ?
it just what i though but im wrong
Low - Below 3
No mans land - 4, 5 and 6
Mid - 7 to 11
High - 12 to around 16
17 and above ... If you enjoy it then fair enough but why bother?
I'd be quite happy with this definition on the following basis........0-9 Low
10-18 Mid
19+ High
I'd be quite happy with this definition on the following basis........
Golf is about making pars.....so.....f you are single figures you par/birdie more than half the holes you play so that's a pretty good standard in my book. 10-18 you usually don't but are probably getting there. Over 18 then pars are relatively rare so you can't be described (yet) as a decent golfer.
I take the point about Cat1, scratch, + men etc but you are looking towards elite people here. There is always a better category to place folk in and taken to extreme everyone who isn't a pro could be described as a duffer (probably accurately!) but I don't think that is helpful to the question posed here.
9 or less 10-18 19-28
can't say i've ever considered a golfer off 9 to be a low handicapper. decent golfer yes, low handicapper...erm, i don't think so!
to me there is a vast distance between a low handicapper and a mid handicapper. the difference is not simply a neat crossover between a 9 and 10.