Imagine had Reed done that. I'm surprised there seems to be little reaction to this, given people on this forum and elsewhere could see what he did. I wonder if anyone is having a stern word with Fitzpatrick to warn him what he did, and to be careful in the future?
This is mostly due to the host broadcaster (CBS) managing to reach new lows when it comes to the appalling standard of their coverage. If Sky weren't able to plug some gaps using the Masters feeds you'd have seen almost nothing of Hatton either, and you'd have to be content with mostly watching flowers and trees.
So, it's a conspiracy then?
A conspiracy to provide atrocious coverage? Far too many of the shots we saw of the leaders were recorded (i.e. not live) - how can that even happen when you're showing almost nobody outside the top 4 on the leaderboard!!
The LiV cheerleaders who are constantly trying to spin a story. No one else gives aOne thing I hate about the tour divide is people trying to turn the majors into LIV vs PGA every time. It's the Masters, it's not a team event - if LIV has shown us anything it's that people don't really care about team events.Who cares where LIV players finished against PGA players, just celebrate the fact we got to see them playing together again for once.
The coverage may well be less than ideal. I certainly didn't think it was great at times. But, it wasn't the point I was making. My point was we simply didn't see some of those guys because they were never really one of the few in contention when the tournament took shape.
I think we did surprisingly well in here to be honest. I think the first mention of LIV was after the tournament finished? Or at least, I don't remember any prolonged discussions about it whilst it was in progress anyway.The LiV cheerleaders who are constantly trying to spin a story. No one else gives a
In reality there wasn’t a LiV player in contention so the story has to be the % of LiV v PGA in the top 12 or some other such nonsense.
Think the first image was from a drone camera.What on earth was going on with Scheffeler’s ball in 15th bunker? First camera showed it plugged. 2nd showed it nowhere near the pitch mark. Ok so deceptive camera angles. Then Butch says and I quote “when we saw the shot the camera went off of it after it plugged then went away and didn’t show it coming out”. Did a gopher pop up and head it away?
He won't go in on the bet every tournament, but likely will all Majors. For example, he will not place a bet at 4/1 for the Heritage next week, a week after a masters win on a course that he hasn't excelled at with a wife about to give birth.
He won't go in on the bet every tournament, but likely will all Majors. For example, he will not place a bet at 4/1 for the Heritage next week, a week after a masters win on a course that he hasn't excelled at with a wife about to give birth.
He is signed up to one or two websites that give you millions of golf statistics for every single player, form, performances at various golf courses, etc. He'll also look at the side of the draw they are on, and will they likely benefit or not with weather. he basically has a lot of attributes he looks at for players going into every tournament, although Scheffler ticks off most of them every time.
He did say, Scheffler excluded as he is a different class, that he won't be placing bets pre tournament much any more, and instead wait for tournaments to take shape. Since the advent of LIV and PGAT signature events, it has caused huge volatility in results. Can't be so sure anymore that the top guys will be focused as much on regular tour events anymore.
Ohh, and he said he'll never back McIlroy for the Masters anymore, unless he changes his caddy
