Imurg
The Grinder Of Pars (Semi Crocked)
If you could vote for none of the above, what would happen if that had the most votes?
Everyone would know what the majority think about the Candidates for sure.....
If you could vote for none of the above, what would happen if that had the most votes?
Everyone would know what the majority think about the Candidates for sure.....
In about 35 years of committee work I can only recall one occasion where, after a vote, a proposed committee member was not elected.
What does that say about the silent [spineless] majority.
Everyone would know what the majority think about the Candidates for sure.....
Always make the effort to vote. It should be made mandatory to cast your vote, too many people are just apathetic towards the whole thing and that's just not right. It was a hard fought for right and it should be acknowledged as such.
That for whatever reason they think it is pointless attending as it is already a done deal?
But as Foxy said, if you have a Right to do something then surely you have an equal right to not do it..?
When there's a vote in the HP, how many times do you hear that X number of MP's abstained..?
Isn't that the same as someone not voting at an election because they don't feel they can vote for any of the candidates..?
The MP is actively deciding to not vote either way...
And surely the right of an MP to vote in the HP is as hard fought a right as anything else..?
Aren't they the same people that appear to do what ever they want at times and we have to foot the bill for it.
Maybe that's why people may not want to vote for them....
I can never quite agree with this view. And, in this case, the wording is wrong, imo, anyway!
Whole generations have not died for this! Many people have died, across many generations..., but not entire generations - as far as I know!
And what they fought for was the right to vote which also includes the right to not vote! A conscious non-vote, or 'spoiled' vote is just as, if not more, valid than a random vote imo!
It should be law that you have to vote.There should be a none of the above option, but everyone eligible to vote,should.
To add to that, they should really bring voting into the 21st century, with smart phones etc, it shouldn't be that hard.
Why in a free country should I not have the right to choose to vote or not? If I was forced to vote then there should be "none of the above" option.
People say that people have died for this country to give freedom to the people that live in it, so why not honour that by still giving someone the freedom to choose.
I've got zero interest in the 'fought for the right' argument, it's flawed.I just believe that if you're contributing to society, and finding fault in some aspects of the way a country is ran, by the elected party, you should be required to either vote one way or another, or register your antipathy towards all the choices by none of the above option.
and anyone on any kind of benefit should automatically have their benefits stopped if they refuse to engage in the most essential part of a democratic society.
I really detest people who do not vote and then spend half of their waking hours complaining about the people who were voted in.
I have always voted in national and local elections.
The reason.......Far to many people have died for me to have that privilege.