spongebob59
Journeyman Pro
I'm not sure Pizza Express in Woking came out of that interview very well.
I'm not sure Pizza Express in Woking came out of that interview very well.
Sounds like you had the exact same conversation as I had with my good lady..Playing devils advocate here a lot. but discussing the Prince Andrew thing with my better half. For the moment, let’s ignore Epstein, the interview and any procurement. And forget for the moment that he is a Royal.
In 2001 Andrew was not married, that ended in 1996. Therefore he was single.
The lady in question was 17, above the age of consent in the UK, where the alleged acts took place, but under the age of consent in the States where she is from. Which takes precedence legally?
Trammps nightclub had an over 18’s policy.
So if you are a single bloke and you meet a woman in a club and things advance, has HE actually done anything wrong?
Now the questions start, did he know her age? Does it matter (see above)
Was she procured, did he know?
Why has this blown up nearly 20 years later?
I have no liking for Andrew, and the interview was a massive huge and incredible misjudgment as was his continued relationship with Epstein.
Big thumbs up for Emily Maitlis though
But is he another example of a social media hurricane? Where everyone jumps on the bandwagon.
Now by doing this interview he has opened up a can of worms, lost the little credibility he had left, but was he forced to do it by the unrelenting media pressure?
Needing to satisfy my honourable British notion of fair play.
Fake news?Many years ago, I was a member of a motorbike forum. We used to meet up for rideouts, Christmas do's that sort of thing.
The Missus and I became friendly with a couple who lived near Windsor.
The husband worked on the Windsor Estate. He told me something about Andrew that I found difficult to believe at the time, but recent events seem to bear out what he was saying.
I think it's more important to check the breaks before putting.Best check his breaks before driving lol
Probably has @Aimpoint!I think it's more important to check the breaks before putting.
I get what you're saying and have plenty of sympathy with those arguements, however I have grave concerns about any man of the that age (at the time of these events) that entertains any sort of physical action with a girl so young in comparison and only just over legal age. It may not be illegal, but morally and ethically I find it wrong. I also doubt he didn't know how old she really was.Playing devils advocate here a lot. but discussing the Prince Andrew thing with my better half. For the moment, let’s ignore Epstein, the interview and any procurement. And forget for the moment that he is a Royal.
In 2001 Andrew was not married, that ended in 1996. Therefore he was single.
The lady in question was 17, above the age of consent in the UK, where the alleged acts took place, but under the age of consent in the States where she is from. Which takes precedence legally?
Trammps nightclub had an over 18’s policy.
So if you are a single bloke and you meet a woman in a club and things advance, has HE actually done anything wrong?
Now the questions start, did he know her age? Does it matter (see above)
Was she procured, did he know?
Why has this blown up nearly 20 years later?
I have no liking for Andrew, and the interview was a massive huge and incredible misjudgment as was his continued relationship with Epstein.
Big thumbs up for Emily Maitlis though
But is he another example of a social media hurricane? Where everyone jumps on the bandwagon.
Now by doing this interview he has opened up a can of worms, lost the little credibility he had left, but was he forced to do it by the unrelenting media pressure?
Needing to satisfy my honourable British notion of fair play.
Sounds like you had the exact same conversation as I had with my good lady..
Not in anyway defending or attacking what he has done, I'm actually very neutral in this whole debate. But if you, me or anyone was single in a late night drinking establishment where 18 is the legal minimum age to enter and they have staff working the doors checking this policy is adhered to and we met a lady, had a few drinks and were invited back per se would anyone really say "hang on a minute love can I check your I.D first". I'm sorry but I'm not convinced that anyone would at all, because like you said Tramps has an over 18 policy so has he really done anything wrong.
Whether people think morally he has or not imo is irrelevant, I think the real thing that matters in this case is has he done anything legally wrong. Based on UK laws no he hasn't committed any crime, which as you say then comes down to what is the age of consent in the US, which isn't strictly true as being 18! The US allows its individual states to govern the age of consent and they each in turn set it at either 16, 17, or 18. Now if the woman in question is from Florida where from what I've seen her father is from so my assumption is that is her home state then the age of consent there is currently 18!
I really don't know how this should play out based on that legal point alone and which takes precedence, my only experience of this is when I was based in Germany we were all given a talk on the pitfalls of age of consent as out there its 14 for going out drinking, clubbing and sexual activities but as British military personnel we were to govenerned on the British age of 16 minimum.
The other fact here is now that because he defended the relationship with Epstein and awkwardness of the interview means regardless of what can or cannot be proven he'll be tainted of guilt by associations
As I've said in my post I'm not defending him nor condemning him, I'm merely pointing out what is factually known to be true and that is that legally under UK law he has done nothing wrong. If she had been 14/15 that's a different conversation to the one at hand and yes should be punished by the law regardless of where they met, but also the establishment where they met should face sanctions as well for allowing minors to be there.If she had been 14/15, but happened to get into the nightclub, I'm not sure how the "I've done nothing wrong because the doormen let her in" if you had to defend yourself in a court of law?
If she had been 14/15, but happened to get into the nightclub, I'm not sure how the "I've done nothing wrong because the doormen let her in" if you had to defend yourself in a court of law?
He didn't say that. He said he couldn't recall meeting her & suggested that there was no way of proving whether the photo was fake.I didn’t get he was adamant he had never met her but there have been photos in the media for a long time.
As I've said in my post I'm not defending him nor condemning him, I'm merely pointing out what is factually known to be true and that is that legally under UK law he has done nothing wrong. If she had been 14/15 that's a different conversation to the one at hand and yes should be punished by the law regardless of where they met, but also the establishment where they met should face sanctions as well for allowing minors to be there.
But your what if point Could easily be turned around as say what if she had been 20/21 would it even make the news because she wasn't a teenager.