ChilliPepper
Newbie
Are you saying that's a bad thing?
Not at all but in my opinion its not really moving the game forward by encouraging youngsters either.
Are you saying that's a bad thing?
But my old club did not actively encourage my kids into the clubhouse. Which in turn meant that they have not developed an interest in the game. My new club IS actively encouraging them and therefore there is a CHANCE that they may develop an interest.. They're playing the long game..:thup:[/QUOTE/]
Appreciated and to be honest your new club sounds great but with or without it your kids would be around golf. What about the kids whose parents don't play golf? Don't get me wrong I think all clubs should be like that but if potential players never make it to the clubhouse in the first place how will they ever know how good it is?
im not arguing for change. I think that change will happen though. I'm a firm believer in their being a broad selection of clubs that appeal to all. That way everyone can get what they want. But, this thread is about how we can move the game forward and people are just making suggestions. If it was about how a club should be run, then you may get different answers.
Appreciated and to be honest your new club sounds great but with or without it your kids would be around golf. What about the kids whose parents don't play golf? Don't get me wrong I think all clubs should be like that but if potential players never make it to the clubhouse in the first place how will they ever know how good it is?
What I should have perhaps said... Why do all threads regarding taking the game forward centre around changing the ways of the old school... When this happens by way of natural progression as evidenced by the wide array of choices already available...
So what are you classing as "youngsters" ??? Our club has a huge junior section, can't remember the exact number but it's at least 80. And a lot of their parents don't play at our club, a lot if them do aswell though.
Yet our club ran a survey and we only had 6 members aged between 21-30.
Reason for that for me is these young lads/girls are brought by parents, once they have freedom of choice when they are 17/18, start driving cars, able to get into pubs, getting a girl, etc etc, all of sudden golf seems expensive/boring and can hamper the party lifestyle. Once they get into their 20's they start getting married/having kids/buying houses once again golf seems an expense that can't be afforded.
Our club tried to find a way around it by offering a money sliding scale for those under 30, 16-21 you pay 50% of adult fees, 21-25 you pay 60%, then 25-30 you pay 70%. We also offer a rolling year membership.
And still the number if members get smaller each year????????
I stated in another thread that my kids think Golf is "boring". They can't understand the rules, they think it's too slow and they have very few real "character" golfers to aspire to be like. Slow play is probably the biggest obstacle for kids. They're used to everything being fast paced and exciting, then they see Zach Johnson or Kevin Na spend several minutes preparing to take a single shot. They don't understand it and they therefore discount it. The authorities need to make a real stand and start heavily penalizing the offenders.. Until that time, the game just won't appeal to the majority of kids, especially those who don't have someone to explain it to them.
Maybe it's a good thing that people are clamoring for change. It may be a sign that the tipping point has been reached and that change will be accelerated. I do agree that it is only one aspect of the game though, and that if the game was made more appealing, then the Clubhouse would matter less. I remember when my Rugby Club insisted on shirts and ties on game day. Plenty moaned, but we were a successful Club, with a good first team.. No one left.. At the end of the day, the game is what matters most.
I have always wondered why no one has devised a simplified game that kids can play much like touch rugby. Simplified rules, and a shot clock over nine holes may keep the attention of younger kids until they start to understand why the Zach Johnsons and Kevin Na's take so long and they can be slowly integrated into the full game. Although this may cause its own problems if they decide that the simplified game they used to play is more fun.
I am intrigued that all conversations regarding getting more people playing golf comes down to dress codes. I don't think I have ever met anyone who says they won't play golf as they aren't allowed to wear jeans...!
Open days, making it more accessible for youngsters (maybe some sort of initiative from the government to include in school PE lessons) etc is the case. Whatever happens, it needs to happen sharpish, as the kids of today are tomorrow's members!
Fully agree, although I think that quite a lot of people would complain if the course was over-run with kids every week.. However, my local Muni has a great little 9 hole par 3 practise course that would be ideal for introducing kids to the game. Nothing over 200 yards and cheap to play..:thup:
I do agree that some rules need to be relaxed,jeans in the club house shouldn't even be an issue IMO. Nothing wrong with jeans,trainers & a polo shirt. Not so sure about football tops & jogging bottoms tho. & I'm sorry but anyone that as a problem with some one else playing golf with their t shirt untucked needs to have a word with themselves.
With you about footy shirts and joggers - and not really sure why. probably because footy tops just are not necessary when anythinog else can be worn and joggers can be just too sloppy and all over the shop.