Steve Williams, $12m Slave.

A monumentally poor choice of word. Far too many connotations. Particularly poor choice given that its in a book and not just an interview.

And no small degree of irony bearing in mind his owner, sorry, employer. Or was that just the ultimate in cyclical marketing?
 
Totally agree. The word has been used subjectively to cause maximum publicity and cynically giving the context of "slave" in the US

Yes I agree! Shameful sensationalism by either the author, publisher or agent.

The 'S' word cynically selected to wring maximum publicity from a rather tawdry kiss and tell style otherwise uninteresting Christmas cash-in.
 
Whilst tiger is obviously responsible for his money, we must forget that Williams
Is regarded as a cut above when it comes to caddys. Not in class, but in performance
 
Expect it in the 99p book bin after xmas.

If it is I might buy one then, and post it to him with a little note to remind him to check history in relation to slaves. I used to carry a bag much heavier than that for much longer distances and only got a few hundred £ a week. He must be devastated being made to do such menial tasks for such mega bucks.

And to think nobody had heard of Tiger before Steve turned him into the worlds best golfer
 
Mind you, he's not the first high paid sportsman to say this. Remember Ronaldo when he wanted to go to Real Madrid and called himself a "modern day slave"?

It's a shocking use of a term from people who clearly have no context of what being a slave really is.
 
I assume he has an agent and the publisher will have a proof-reader/editor, both must have noticed this and decided it was appropriate for it to be included (either for sales at the cost of morals or for morals at the cost of sales, depending on your point of view) but I can’t help feeling he’s made the wrong choice by writing it both morally and for the affect on sales
 
Why is that? Why wouldn't you want to read about the man who has caddied in 14 major wins. The closest man to the player?

It will be a fascinating read. Just like The big miss by Hank Haney

I'll certainly read it - think it will be fascinating as you say :thup:
 
Why is that? Why wouldn't you want to read about the man who has caddied in 14 major wins. The closest man to the player?

It will be a fascinating read. Just like The big miss by Hank Haney

It' was an attempt at humour. It may be worth a read but when these types of soundbites are released to publicise the book it begs the question in my mind whether it needs the publicity as it's short of actual content.
 
Top