Rlburnside
Challenge Tour Pro
As I swapped cards yesterday I signed my pps card in the clubhouse before the round, my pp told me I wasn’t allowed to do this is he correct?
As I swapped cards yesterday I signed my pps card in the clubhouse before the round, my pp told me I wasn’t allowed to do this is he correct?
As I swapped cards yesterday I signed my pps card in the clubhouse before the round, my pp told me I wasn’t allowed to do this is he correct?
This is the advice from CONGUAs I swapped cards yesterday I signed my pps card in the clubhouse before the round, my pp told me I wasn’t allowed to do this is he correct?
@Colin L Is the signature not confirming the score on the card? If you haven't played yet, how do you know what will be on the card at the end is correct? Makes signing a nonsense doesn't it? Another weird one.
The Rules do not dictate when cards have to be signed.
Cards shouldn't be swapped. Well, we are not allowed to.
Thanks, interesting. I've never heard of this before ?I'm answering this outwith the context of Covid regulations.
Many would regard pre-signing a card as marker or player as bad practice, but it isn't prohibited. The rules are concerned only with what is on the card when it is returned. As a marker, the player's card is in your possession. You confirm his score at the end of each hole and write it down. At the end of the round you check it and hand it over, signed to show that you have certified the score. You know what is on the card is correct because you put it there and have checked it with the player. If you signed it before the game started to make sure you didn't forget at the end, what difference does it make?
Many would regard pre-signing a card as marker or player as bad practice, but it isn't prohibited. The rules are concerned only with what is on the card when it is returned. As a marker, the player's card is in your possession. You confirm his score at the end of each hole and write it down. At the end of the round you check it and hand it over, signed to show that you have certified the score. You know what is on the card is correct because you put it there and have checked it with the player. If you signed it before the game started to make sure you didn't forget at the end, what difference does it make?
Thanks, interesting. I've never heard of this before ?
I may not have understood the OP correctly, but I believe that the markers signature signifies that the marker has verified the players score.
If I was marking a card and the player and I disputed the score, I wouldn’t sign it .
I may not have understood the OP correctly, but I believe that the markers signature signifies that the marker has verified the players score.
If I was marking a card and the player and I disputed the score, I wouldn’t sign it .
Rule 3.3: "After the round, the player and the marker (who keeps the player’s score) must certify that the player’s score for each hole is right and the player must return the scorecard to the Committee."I'm answering this outwith the context of Covid regulations.
Many would regard pre-signing a card as marker or player as bad practice, but it isn't prohibited. The rules are concerned only with what is on the card when it is returned. As a marker, the player's card is in your possession. You confirm his score at the end of each hole and write it down. At the end of the round you check it and hand it over, signed to show that you have certified the score. You know what is on the card is correct because you put it there and have checked it with the player. If you signed it before the game started to make sure you didn't forget at the end, what difference does it make?
Rule 3.3: "After the round, the player and the marker (who keeps the player’s score) must certify that the player’s score for each hole is right and the player must return the scorecard to the Committee."
Most would probably regard signing the card as the act of certifying, in which case the rules clearly state that it should be done after the round, not before (or during). By extension, it could be argued that no certification has been done when a card is signed before any scores have been entered.
It would be an interesting one for the committee if they became aware of cards being signed in advance and there was no evidence of certification after the round.Most probably would, but the rules do not even state the signing should be done after the round never mind that it must be.
If the players, having signed their cards before the round, follow the normal process of checking after the round that they have gotten consistent answers on the scores and they have no disagreements, then they have "certified" the scores as required by 3.3b. The rules do not preclude the physical signing of the card occurring before the round but that alone would not constitute "certifying" as required by the rules in the absence of a post final hole confirmation (which can be oral) that all is correct for submitting. There is no rules-based requirement for further 'evidence' of certification - if a Committee has any doubt about whether it occurred, they would need to ask the players - did you affirm after the round that the scores were correct?It would be an interesting one for the committee if they became aware of cards being signed in advance and there was no evidence of certification after the round.