HogansAlley
Assistant Pro
I'm pretty certain Mickleson would have got the club hecked over by the rule guys before putting it in his bag.
The issue for me is not whether the club is legal: under USGA rules (not R&A, I believe) the old Ping wedge is clearly legal. It is about whether it is within the spirit of the game. I would say it is definitely not. However, I can also see the argument that says 'if it's within the rules, it okay to use'. If I was on the PGA Tour (let me dream, folks) I would not consider for one moment using the old Ping wedge. This rule was brought in for the long-term good of the game, and he's effectively sticking two fingers up at it.
Oooh I'm getting quite heated here.
Don't take this personally, but....
RUBBISH.
If the rule was brought in purely for the good of the game, then why was there such a cock up over the original rule. It's all about politics and power within the game.
Who is more powerful, the USGA or the manufacturers. Ping will use this to get something that has already NOT been approved by the USGA reassessed and it will suddenly become acceptable.
When that happens all this free publicity will get the new wedge made legal, the old wedge will become illegal, and Ping will sell lots of new stuff.
You don't think Ping want 20 year old bits of kit floating around making the new stuff look bad. As soon as it pays them to, they will agree to ban the old wedge, no problem.
Forget morality, this is all about money and power.
No offence taken, mate. I stand by every word. The spirit of the game will always be subjective and a matter for the individual. The fact is if that Ping wedge was manufactured today it would be illegal - and that's enough for me to think that it shouldn't be used.
There are many things in life that are legal but morally questionable.
As others have mentioned, the old Ping wedge will be outlawed soon because it's not in anyone's interest - least of all Ping.
Excellent debate, fellas!