Rory in bunker

Joined
Jul 7, 2018
Messages
611
Location
Lombardy, Italy
Visit site
It could be argued that when removing a true impediment such as a stone the surrounding sand would be fractionally altered - so some leeway must be expected and accepted in the spirit of the rules at least

More worrying may be Brysons response - he will be bringing his CSI mass spectrometer to analyse the true chemical nature of potential impediments before acting in any similar fashion
 

drdel

Tour Rookie
Joined
Aug 28, 2013
Messages
4,374
Visit site
It could be argued that when removing a true impediment such as a stone the surrounding sand would be fractionally altered - so some leeway must be expected and accepted in the spirit of the rules at least

More worrying may be Brysons response - he will be bringing his CSI mass spectrometer to analyse the true chemical nature of potential impediments before acting in any similar fashion

I agree, any loose impedement will have some sand attached.
 

Swinglowandslow

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 19, 2018
Messages
2,724
Visit site
Checking the wording of the rules, Italian Outcast has a good point. Rule 12.2b says

"
(1) When Touching Sand Results in Penalty. Before making a stroke at a ball in a bunker, a player must not:

  • Deliberately touch sand in the bunker with a hand, club, rake or other object to test the condition of the sand to learn information for the next stroke, or

  • Touch sand in the bunker with a club:
    • In the area right in front of or right behind the ball (except as allowed under Rule 7.1a in fairly searching for a ball or under Rule 12.2a in removing a loose impediment or movable obstruction),
    • In making a practice swing, or
    • In making the backswing for a stroke.
"

Rory touched the sand with his hand but not deliberately to test the condition of the sand.

I've changed my mind after seeing this and think there should have been no penalty but I'm sure the experts will educate us.

Your reasoning is spot on. Must be an element of intent.
 
Top