IanM
Journeyman Pro
- Joined
- May 18, 2009
- Messages
- 13,379
- Location
- Monmouthshire, UK via Guildford!
Additional thought....wonder why they didn't DQ him after the round to avoid the disruption to his playing partners?
Golf is not known for its common sense.Additional thought....wonder why they didn't DQ him after the round to avoid the disruption to his playing partners?
Did you put him right or just sit back and enjoy events unfold?
Additional thought....wonder why they didn't DQ him after the round to avoid the disruption to his playing partners?
How does markings on the face help with alignment? If it was on the top I'd understand but you can't see the face of the driver when you address the ball ?.You are correct.
But you do need some spin to get the ball airborne.
Imo he’s done that as an alignment aid rather than a spin or performance thing.
Stupid boy, given the equipment avaliable to them just get a professional who knows what he’s doing to do it in the tour van.
Imo that dosnt look like a driver it looks more like a 3 wood.How does markings on the face help with alignment? If it was on the top I'd understand but you can't see the face of the driver when you address the ball ?.
I'm not disputing what you say, others are saying the same, but I'm just not seeing it.
Sorry, you are absolutely correct about it being a 3 wood. At that point, yes, you can frame the ball and club. It all becomes clear now ?Imo that dosnt look like a driver it looks more like a 3 wood.
So with more loft you can see the lines.
It looks like he has blackened the face to make the white lines stand out more.
The way the marking are you use these to frame the ball in the sweet spot.
Probably dosnt make much difference, but if it helps him it’s worth it but you can’t take that to the course in a comp.
Yes I have just read the article on op.Sorry, you are absolutely correct about it being a 3 wood. At that point, yes, you can frame the ball and club. It all becomes clear now ?
Yes I have just read the article on op.
Fairway wood with correction fluid in the grooves how silly of him.
The pros practice so much he has probably just worn the original finish off.
Not trying to gain any advantage imo ,just a stupid mistake.
We all make them, but at that level ???
To me that looks like it hasn’t been used.What were his "club guy" and caddie thinking of? One of my gripes about caddies is that they spend vast amounts of time in hotel rooms and on flights. They should know more about the rules of golf than anybody, if only to protect their employer from these foibles of golf.
Surely a simple question to a rules official before the round would clear any doubts
Maybe he thought the correction fluid would correct a slice or hook?
Nothing applied post-production as far as I can see so clubs would have been tested at design and development phase for their compliance…and so compliant.Maxfli Roberto de Vincenzo driver and 3-wood.
Dunlop Peter Thomson 4-wood and 5-wood.
Is there any question regard to these?
If so, how could I make them legal?
View attachment 42895
I’d not want to use it. Who’s to know whether or not the innocent looking black paint has special ‘grip’ or ‘water repellent’ properties.What about this Peter Thomson driver currently on sale on ebay?
Black paint has been applied to the maroon and white face, leaving only a bit of the original white paint showing through.
Really crap and unnecessary attempt at restoration or improvement.
Has it been rendered illegal?
View attachment 42896
Given the DQ for Matsuyama I would say yes.What about this Peter Thomson driver currently on sale on ebay?
Black paint has been applied to the maroon and white face, leaving only a bit of the original white paint showing through.
Really crap and unnecessary attempt at restoration or improvement.
Has it been rendered illegal?
View attachment 42896
Maxfli Roberto de Vincenzo driver and 3-wood.
Dunlop Peter Thomson 4-wood and 5-wood.
Is there any question regard to these?
If so, how could I make them legal?
View attachment 42895