Luiz Suarez

[brendy]

Can't wait to see the Liverpool fans defend him on this one and turn it round to be victimisation of poor Luiz

Absolutely despicable runt of a man who should be banned for a long time

Nah, its time he went.

 

[Aztecs27]

Whilst what he did has no place in football and he's a total cretin (but a fantastic talent), i find it LOLsome that people on Twitter and Facebook are reacting like he's some kind of international war criminal! some people need to get a grip.

 

[Imurg]

All well & good Phil, if Chelsea miss out on the top 4 and the income that comes from the Champions League by one point, having dropped 2 because of the goal scored by a player who shouldn't have been on, what retrospective action will be taken then?

But how many times has that principle occured in pro football this season alone..?
Virtually every game and there's something that could/should/would have affected the outcome.
Yeah Suarez is a runt - we all knew that months ago. He's just proved it today.
Chelsea weren't good enough to win on the day. The league position at the end of the season will include good breaks and bad ones.
It's Football - take it on the chin ( or arm!) and do better next time..

 

[Deleted member 1740]

All well & good Phil, if Chelsea miss out on the top 4 and the income that comes from the Champions League by one point, having dropped 2 because of the goal scored by a player who shouldn't have been on, what retrospective action will be taken then?

What about all the other points Chelsea have dropped this season?

I'm not defending Suarez,but he can't be blamed directly if the above happens.

 

[Deleted member 1740]

Nah, its time he went.

Without him Liverpool would be fighting relegation.

 

[bozza]

Isn't it policy that if an incident is seen by, or reported to the ref and he decides not to take action that's as far as it goes,
The retrospective action is only taken when the ref misses something

Get tigers lawyers onto it, they will save his sorry butt

The ref didn't see it as far as i'm aware, so he will get a ban for sure and a long one!

 

[Captainron]

The man is just the most awful human being in the game. He has repeatedly shown that he is dishonest and violent. I would love to see a proper ban in place for this. In rugby you can be cited whether the ref sees the incident and takes action. Football needs to get its act together and use the technology available. In my opinion he should be banned from playing for at least a year and all his wages docked.

 

[Blue in Munich]

What about all the other points Chelsea have dropped this season?

I'm not defending Suarez,but he can't be blamed directly if the above happens.

Were they dropped as a direct result of a goal scored by a player who should have been sent off?

No, Suarez isn't to blame for still being on the field, the fault for that lies with Kevin Friend and the assistant referees.

 

[Foxholer]

All well & good Phil, if Chelsea miss out on the top 4 and the income that comes from the Champions League by one point, having dropped 2 because of the goal scored by a player who shouldn't have been on, what retrospective action will be taken then?

Someone (a Chelsea fan, but that doesn't matter) pointed out the Manchester United has 'gained' 16 points from offside goals! While that's quite a stat - especially as a West Ham follower - I just put that down to the foibles of the human error element that I believe is an essential part of most sport - and the aggressive/conservative nature of tactics that different teams adopt.

As long as the FA reviews the incident and takes appropriate action, I'd be satisfied. I'm inclined to think the Rugby Union citing method has distinct benefits over Football's somewhat ham-strung approach.

 

[Kellfire]

It will be interesting to see if they take into account his previous biting ban from his Ajax days.

 

[Pin-seeker]

 

[Rooter]

LFC can here, can't defend him. He is a fantastic footballer no question, but we can't have that in any football team. He has to go. We will struggle badly without him, but I just about defended him over evra gate, no defence on this one. Sorry luis, your time is up in English football.

 

[Deleted member 1740]

It will be interesting to see if they take into account his previous biting ban from his Ajax days.

I don't think they could.

If he does get banned it should only be based on this incident.

 

[Pin-seeker]

He's on par with Diouf n Barton. Scum!!!!!

 

[Mr_T]

Despite his unquestionably fantastic ability, would I ever have him in my team? Not a chance. The man is a disgraceful somewhat sub-human creature, words cannot express how much hatred I have for the man. Seen by the ref or not, if the FA don't take action on this then it will be a farce, sadly he can probably only have 2 weeks wages docked but hopefully he is banned for the rest of the season and some of next as well.

Liverpool must surely be at the end of their tether with him, trouble is where does he go? Despite being a great player how many teams are going to want to take a chance on that kind of liability? They may find it harder to get rid of him than they think

 

[One Planer]

He's on par with Diouf n Barton. Scum!!!!!

^
^
^
^

Gareth likes this :thup:

It's amazing what money and a bit of fame can do to folk.

 

[Kellfire]

T'internet works quickly...

 

[In_The_Rough]

T'internet works quickly...

 

[MegaSteve]

He's on par with Diouf n Barton. Scum!!!!!

Cantona was capable of equal 'idiocy' yet he is considered 'charismatic'...

 

[Aztecs27]

Cantona was capable of equal 'idiocy' yet he is considered 'charismatic'...

So very true. One could argue that drop kicking a fan is the worst of all, yet he is still considered a "legend".