Luiz Suarez

Aztecs27

Money List Winner
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
8,112
Location
Gloucester, UK
Visit site
Whilst what he did has no place in football and he's a total cretin (but a fantastic talent), i find it LOLsome that people on Twitter and Facebook are reacting like he's some kind of international war criminal! :D some people need to get a grip.
 

Imurg

The Grinder Of Pars (Semi Crocked)
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
37,808
Location
Aylesbury Bucks
Visit site
All well & good Phil, if Chelsea miss out on the top 4 and the income that comes from the Champions League by one point, having dropped 2 because of the goal scored by a player who shouldn't have been on, what retrospective action will be taken then?

But how many times has that principle occured in pro football this season alone..?
Virtually every game and there's something that could/should/would have affected the outcome.
Yeah Suarez is a runt - we all knew that months ago. He's just proved it today.
Chelsea weren't good enough to win on the day. The league position at the end of the season will include good breaks and bad ones.
It's Football - take it on the chin ( or arm!) and do better next time..
 
D

Deleted member 1740

Guest
All well & good Phil, if Chelsea miss out on the top 4 and the income that comes from the Champions League by one point, having dropped 2 because of the goal scored by a player who shouldn't have been on, what retrospective action will be taken then?

What about all the other points Chelsea have dropped this season?

I'm not defending Suarez,but he can't be blamed directly if the above happens.
 

bozza

Journeyman Pro
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
2,186
Location
Darlington
Visit site
Isn't it policy that if an incident is seen by, or reported to the ref and he decides not to take action that's as far as it goes,
The retrospective action is only taken when the ref misses something

Get tigers lawyers onto it, they will save his sorry butt

The ref didn't see it as far as i'm aware, so he will get a ban for sure and a long one!
 

Captainron

Big Hitting, South African Sweary Person
Joined
Sep 25, 2011
Messages
6,517
Location
Rural Lincolnshire
Visit site
The man is just the most awful human being in the game. He has repeatedly shown that he is dishonest and violent. I would love to see a proper ban in place for this. In rugby you can be cited whether the ref sees the incident and takes action. Football needs to get its act together and use the technology available. In my opinion he should be banned from playing for at least a year and all his wages docked.
 

Blue in Munich

Crocked Professional Yeti Impersonator
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
14,099
Location
Worcester Park
Visit site
What about all the other points Chelsea have dropped this season?

I'm not defending Suarez,but he can't be blamed directly if the above happens.

Were they dropped as a direct result of a goal scored by a player who should have been sent off?

No, Suarez isn't to blame for still being on the field, the fault for that lies with Kevin Friend and the assistant referees.
 

Foxholer

Blackballed
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
24,160
Visit site
All well & good Phil, if Chelsea miss out on the top 4 and the income that comes from the Champions League by one point, having dropped 2 because of the goal scored by a player who shouldn't have been on, what retrospective action will be taken then?

Someone (a Chelsea fan, but that doesn't matter) pointed out the Manchester United has 'gained' 16 points from offside goals! While that's quite a stat - especially as a West Ham follower - I just put that down to the foibles of the human error element that I believe is an essential part of most sport - and the aggressive/conservative nature of tactics that different teams adopt.

As long as the FA reviews the incident and takes appropriate action, I'd be satisfied. I'm inclined to think the Rugby Union citing method has distinct benefits over Football's somewhat ham-strung approach.
 

Rooter

Money List Winner
Joined
Jan 30, 2012
Messages
10,807
Location
Newbury
Visit site
LFC can here, can't defend him. He is a fantastic footballer no question, but we can't have that in any football team. He has to go. We will struggle badly without him, but I just about defended him over evra gate, no defence on this one. Sorry luis, your time is up in English football.
 
D

Deleted member 1740

Guest
It will be interesting to see if they take into account his previous biting ban from his Ajax days.


I don't think they could.

If he does get banned it should only be based on this incident.
 

Mr_T

Challenge Tour Pro
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
742
Visit site
Despite his unquestionably fantastic ability, would I ever have him in my team? Not a chance. The man is a disgraceful somewhat sub-human creature, words cannot express how much hatred I have for the man. Seen by the ref or not, if the FA don't take action on this then it will be a farce, sadly he can probably only have 2 weeks wages docked but hopefully he is banned for the rest of the season and some of next as well.

Liverpool must surely be at the end of their tether with him, trouble is where does he go? Despite being a great player how many teams are going to want to take a chance on that kind of liability? They may find it harder to get rid of him than they think
 

Kellfire

Blackballed
Joined
Jul 11, 2009
Messages
7,580
Location
Leeds
Visit site
T'internet works quickly...

313891_644414782251126_623498578_n.jpg
 
Top