wull
Tour Rookie
Never mind the driving offences, naming her child “Bunny” is surely worth some lengthy prison time?
Perhaps the Priory itself? All good publicity for them, keeps their name at the forefront of this type of treatment. Most of what she has will be given to her for free, it's the way of the modern z lister.If she's going bankrupt again....who's paying for The Priory..?
Regardless of how much money she may or may not have (I suspect more of the latter), the girl needs help…her head is totally screwed up - she’s a mess.
Being in a mess and need of help does not absolve her of taken responsibility for her actions and the consequences she should face.
I agree. She has no sense of consequence so should be punished properly, but if ever there was someone totally screwed up by fame and money it’s her.
Some of the things done to her are appalling but it’s no excuse for drunk driving.
I actually disagree with throwing her in jail etc. It creates criminals in my view as opposed to curing them, but she should never be allowed to drive again. That’s for sure.
Being in a mess and need of help does not absolve her of taken responsibility for her actions and the consequences she should face.
Not read all the comments, but what surprised me was that, when I saw the headlines (on Sky News) they were very sympathetic. The headline and story was primarily worried about her mental health, and less critical about the consequences of her actions. Just lucky no one was hurt, such as hitting someone head on or hitting a pedestrian.Crashed her car at 6am while allegedly off her face. Currently serving a six month driving ban. Been banned 6 times in the last 10 years.
Does there not come a point when people like this with a total disregard for society's rules get their licence ripped up permanently?
she is already a criminal and was banned from driving until December so she clearly doesn't give a toss about the ban. she even admitted on GMB on Monday that she was banned but needed more nose candy
drive off her tits.
Just wondering how many more times she has got behind the wheel while drunk and drugged up but got away with it ? Seems the norm to her to drive around off her tits.
Maybe flipping her car was a one-off? Or maybe it was the first time she had crashed on that particular street?reading the reports from her hearing, her defence lawyer said it was a "one off."
And how do you that, without locking her up, given that she ignores the bans?I agree. She has no sense of consequence so should be punished properly, but if ever there was someone totally screwed up by fame and money it’s her.
Some of the things done to her are appalling but it’s no excuse for drunk driving.
I actually disagree with throwing her in jail etc. It creates criminals in my view as opposed to curing them, but she should never be allowed to drive again. That’s for sure.
Did I say in my post that she should not be punished or that leniency should be shown. No I didn’t. Compassion is free and is not mutually exclusive from punishment. She is in a mess; her life is in a mess.That's a bit of a deflection from the meaning of your post 55, which suggests she needs help ,as opposed to punishment and keeping her from harming others.
Make your mind up. Either you keep helping offenders or you deter them by unpleasant consequences. Most think that there are some offenders who consider the "help" being given as weakness ,and to be taken advantage of ,so that their behaviour can continue. And therefore it doesn't achieve anything.
And how do you that, without locking her up, given that she ignores the bans?