joining fees

I don't have a problem with clubs charging joining fees. If they're popular enough to charge one in the current financial climate then so be it.
However. I do feel that instead of the jf disappearing into club coffers, it should be paid back to the member, perhaps via discounted subs over a number of years. Ie if you pay £1000 joining fee, you get £100 off your subs for the first 10 years of your membership.

Nothing to stop this happening if the clubs look for a joining fee to promote loyalty rather than just to raise some extra cash.

I like that idea Iain, rewarding loyalty sounds good to me. As long as they maintain good standards, it should work :thup:
 
The type of club you are joining should also be taken into account when thinking about whither a joining fee is reasonable or not.
I would never pay to join a privately owned club and would rather not join one. All of the money getting paid in is lining someone's pockets and only the minimum will get put back into the club.

Joining a private members club on the other hand essentially makes you a shareholder in the club so I can understand why clubs if they can will have a joining fee. I changed clubs a year ago and have had to pay a joining fee of £1000 spread over three years, if i was over 35 that would have doubled to £2000. Its a lot, but the money in these clubs goes back into improving the facilities so at least you can see where the money is going.

A decent club can still command joining fees (round the south east/surrey) and from what I have seen it makes sure the people joining are serious about playing and not going to stay for a year then bugger off somewhere else.

+1; same club, just wish I had been under 35 :( A lot of people moved from my previous club, many to clubs that had no joining fee, and a number of those are moving on again. It can leave those clubs in a precarious position year on year, the joining fee does at least indicate that you are serious about staying, which is what was impressed on me when I applied.
 
I don't have a problem with clubs charging joining fees. If they're popular enough to charge one in the current financial climate then so be it.
However. I do feel that instead of the jf disappearing into club coffers, it should be paid back to the member, perhaps via discounted subs over a number of years. Ie if you pay £1000 joining fee, you get £100 off your subs for the first 10 years of your membership.

Nothing to stop this happening if the clubs look for a joining fee to promote loyalty rather than just to raise some extra cash.


I actually really like that plan Iain.
 
My Club has retained the joining fee (One and a half years membership + current year), the only concession made is that you can now pay it over three years. Seems to be working for them still as the club is still attracting new members and stays at capacity. Must be the quality of the golf course and facilities.

Same my place. Apart from the obvious pecuniary advantage - having a joining fee will most likely tie a new member in for at least a year or two, and if to be paid over say three years pay it does mean that a new member is likely to stay for at least three years.
 
Last edited:
I can see both sides to the joining fee argument, it would make you think twice about leaving a club if you had paid a large joining fee. On the other hand if all the other local courses aren't charging them, a lot of people won't even consider joining. I paid one at my current club 7 years ago and they still charge one now but most comparable local courses don't, the GM advised at last AGM people had enquired about joining but declined as soon as joining fee was mentioned. It hard to judge the lesser evil of people leaving easily or not joining in the 1st place. The course I am waiting to join this year still has a joining fee which I am happy to pay as they are offering a course of a very high standard and still have a waiting list of a few years. If you can offer a standard of course or facilities that others that have no joining fees can't match then I'm sure the joining fee will stay and be readily paid, if the course or facilities are no better then it's a dangerous situation as new members most probably won't consider you.
Lanark ?
 
You pretty much get what you pay for, if you want to be a member of a top quality course then you will most likely have to pay a joining fee. I paid one at my club and I think I get good value for my money.
 
Lanark it is.

Iain I also like that idea, clubs try and promote loyalty but when loyalty hits your pocket then people know where their true loyalties lie.
I get 50% off my fees because i paid full fees to the same club for over 25 yrs and i'm now over 65 ,and i paid a JF to start. so loyalty does pay if you live long enough lucky me
 
I get 50% off my fees because i paid full fees to the same club for over 25 yrs and i'm now over 65 ,and i paid a JF to start. so loyalty does pay if you live long enough lucky me

I agree with rewarding seniors with over 25 yrs loyalty but has to be at realistic rates. My present club has free subs after reaching 65 and having 25 or 30 years membership, think there is just a donation of around £70 to be paid. I think that was all well and good in the past, but people are living a lot longer and playing longer, more and more members are eligible for this and the club has less and less money coming in each year. When it is proposed to be changed and increase the amount to be paid by this group at the AGM each year, most of the eligible people and those approaching it vote against it and see it as their right. The big picture will see the course go downhill fast if this continues as the figures just don't add up.
 
Looks like our fees are going up by 8.4% or £120 as we apparently aren't getting the numbers in. We've ditched the joining fees too and it is becoming increasingly hard for as lot of clubs to entice and more importantly keep them. When we did have the joining fee, it seemed a number of "faces" left and decided the grass wasn't greener at the new place and came back but were exempt from the fee. Personally I don't think it's fair but now the problem has gone I guess its a mute point.

I don't see how increasing the fees will help. It penalises the existing membership for the inability of the board to have a successful recruitment and retention policy. I hope but doubt the new General Manager we've appointed this month will make a difference but we'll have to give him some time to prove me wrong
 
I get why clubs say they charge joining fees but I don't personally agree with them. Ironically I've just moved to a club that do usually charge a joining fee, but currently they are waiving that for a limited number of new member from January until March wen it's being reinstated. If the fee was in place when I toon up the option to join I'd have looked elsewhere.

The way I see it is a joining fee is like a glorified admin fee! If someone said you had to pay 1k for the privilege of some guy filling out the paperwork to buy a new car or book a holiday you'd tell them where to go. It costs enough as a hobby to pay subs, have decent equipment, travel to and from course with current fuel prices etc for me to be able to justify joining fees as well.
 
I agree with rewarding seniors with over 25 yrs loyalty but has to be at realistic rates. My present club has free subs after reaching 65 and having 25 or 30 years membership, think there is just a donation of around £70 to be paid. I think that was all well and good in the past, but people are living a lot longer and playing longer, more and more members are eligible for this and the club has less and less money coming in each year. When it is proposed to be changed and increase the amount to be paid by this group at the AGM each year, most of the eligible people and those approaching it vote against it and see it as their right. The big picture will see the course go downhill fast if this continues as the figures just don't add up.
Withthe discount i still pay around £300.00
 
I've been looking at local clubs with a view to a move at some stage and the one that ticks most boxes is the one that has a joining fee. Well it doesn't but it does. Fees are £1221 a year for the first 5 years, then the rate drops to the "members loyalty rate" of £1071 - the difference being £750. So its a joining fee in all but name.........an extra £150 a year.

If a club has a Joining Fee or a pseudo one like above then I would definitely think twice about joining.
 
Bellshill but used to be at Greenburn

Bellshill is one of the local course's I haven't played, might try and play if they have an open this year. Haven't played Greenburn for about 10 yrs either but can remember the hole with railway viaduct ob right and water down the left, was a tough hole with my driving :D
 
I get 50% off my fees because i paid full fees to the same club for over 25 yrs and i'm now over 65 ,and i paid a JF to start. so loyalty does pay if you live long enough lucky me


You see that is 100% wrong. Why should I subsidise you?
 
Why is it a rip-off?
If you really want to play there, then you'll pay it. If you don't want to pay it, then you you're not that bothered about playing there. No-one makes you pay it?

We still have one - and darned expensive it is too - but that doesn't stop us having a waiting list. And even though I say it myself, our course ain't that great. A decent "club" but only an "ok" course. But, as far as I know, the joining fees are ring-fenced to course improvements.
 
Top