• We'd like to take this opportunity to wish you a Happy Holidays and a very Merry Christmas from all at Golf Monthly. Thank you for sharing your 2025 with us!

Jeremy Corbyn-Leadership quality?

If they didn’t have left wing policies, they wouldn’t be doing the good I want from them.
What good can they do in opposition?

How about they go centre left and then they may actually get to put some policies into effect that are closer to your wants than a Conservative govt? If they hold onto their current path then you will be stuck with a Conservative govt for the next X number of years as there are simply not enough people in the UK who agree with them in their current guise.
 
What good can they do in opposition?

How about they go centre left and then they may actually get to put some policies into effect that are closer to your wants than a Conservative govt? If they hold onto their current path then you will be stuck with a Conservative govt for the next X number of years as there are simply not enough people in the UK who agree with them in their current guise.
Because people on the whole are scared of the bogeyman, the last election came down to Brexit and Labour losing itself.

Added to Brexit that boris was the lesser of 2 evils as far as a lot of people were concerned.

If the next 5 years are productive, good for the Country etc then the Labour policies will be largely irrelevant, if boris makes a pigs ear of it, other parties have a chance.

We’ll always have hard Labour, hard tory, soft Labour, soft tory, the ones in the middles who are looking after No1 are the votes that make the difference.
 
It is interesting (to me at least) that in the states many Democratic strategists and supporters point to Corbyn and what happened to Labour at the last election, when they discuss what might happen to the Dems in the coming presidential election were Bernie Sanders to be the Democratic Party candidate.
 
In the same way people could argue The Conservatives are controlled by and pander to very right wing ideology. It's all relative...

This I think is very true re right wing Tories. Which leaves Joe Public in a very difficult position. Jezzas left wing Labour, or Bojos right wing Tory. Probably why Joe public thinks that re politics, The lunatics have taken over the asylum. The day Labour get more central will be the day Joe Public will start to trust them again. Me finks.
 
I don’t think they are that extreme, they just seem that way to many people because there’s been a massive shift towards people being bigoted and selfish in their politics.
That is applicable to the left of politics just as much as the right. I would put it to you that politics in this country is no where near right wing.
 
We’ll always have hard Labour, hard tory, soft Labour, soft tory, the ones in the middles who are looking after No1 are the votes that make the difference.
I don't agree that being in the middle means you are looking after no 1 but I do agree that the people in the middle hold the balance of power in this country. They are the people you need to bring on board. Boris did, Jeremy didn't. To beat Boris next time Labour need a leader that is not a clone of Jeremy or the same will happen again.
 
Being fairly hard left for a player of golf, I'm not a big believer in "the middle."

The male anatomy makes straddling a fence pretty uncomfortable.

Pick a side for Christ's sake.

I'm all in on Bernie here on this side of the pond.
 
I don't agree that being in the middle means you are looking after no 1 but I do agree that the people in the middle hold the balance of power in this country. They are the people you need to bring on board. Boris did, Jeremy didn't. To beat Boris next time Labour need a leader that is not a clone of Jeremy or the same will happen again.
How did boris bring them on board?

As for looking after No1, I mean those with no loyalty to either and will decide what’s best for them.
 
Being fairly hard left for a player of golf, I'm not a big believer in "the middle."

The male anatomy makes straddling a fence pretty uncomfortable.

Pick a side for Christ's sake.

I'm all in on Bernie here on this side of the pond.

every days a skool day YOB. Dont straddle it, sit on it??
 
I don't agree that being in the middle means you are looking after no 1 but I do agree that the people in the middle hold the balance of power in this country. They are the people you need to bring on board. Boris did, Jeremy didn't. To beat Boris next time Labour need a leader that is not a clone of Jeremy or the same will happen again.

I think Boris brought some onboard. Equally, some Tory supporters may have decided "no" to Boris for similar reasons that some decided on "no" for Corbyn. Although the majority of my voting life I voted Labour I'd class myself as a floating voter. My choices in the main came down to policies and trust. Can't say I've ever agreed with every policy on every manifesto for any party I've voted for but I've looked to support what I believe to be a balanced manifesto. That means there might be the odd painful promise in there but that'll be more than balanced out by other policies.

One thing I've never been Tory on is taxation. I don't think the current system is really fair, or perhaps it just needs a major overhaul and greater transparency. However, if someone had come to me and said "we're hiking your tax by 5% but that full 5% would be spent on social care and the NHS" I'd have been all for it.

As for Corbyn and Momentum; yesterday's news that hopefully just going through its final 'death throes.' I hope Labour become more centre left and put a package together that people can believe in, and that they regain the trust of voters. If they do, they'll get my vote.
 
How did boris bring them on board?

As for looking after No1, I mean those with no loyalty to either and will decide what’s best for them.
Boris managed partly to appeal to more people but I think largely Labour put out a manifesto that people did not believe in or thought had credibility. Being 'not Jeremy ' was enough. A better opposition leader could have wiped the floor with him but neither he nor Jo Swinson were up to it.

I think you are still being harsh with middle voters. Maybe they decide what is best not just for them but wider than that. Better that, to judge each election, than blindly voting the same way no matter who is put in front of you.
 
How did boris bring them on board?

As for looking after No1, I mean those with no loyalty to either and will decide what’s best for them.

Genuine question, why should the public have any loyalty to one party ?

For example labour have changed massively over the years(sometimes swinging between elections), that I have been a voter. If you can not see that, then pass.

in 2019, some of the policies they put forward, were just plain mad, bit like old labour of the early 80s(ish guess). They lost my vote on that basis, nothing really to do with tories or JC etc.

I can understand that someone leans more left, but that doesn't mean I would ever support a far left leaning labour party. I would rather vote LDems or another party or not vote at all.

I am one of those floating voters tbh. Get the impression from some people, that some think that is actually wrong and that those people are just voting looking after myself, which is not the way I vote. Policies have to make sense and be workable in the real world.

Loyalty and politics do not go hand in hand. And never understood, why someone will just follow a party/leader, just because due it being called Labour or Cons, LD or SNP, irrelevant of their policies.:unsure:
 
JC has stuffed the Labour Party. The last election result showed how much people mistrust the guy and his policies. It’s a moot point though because he’s a nobody now.
 
Genuine question, why should the public have any loyalty to one party ?

For example labour have changed massively over the years(sometimes swinging between elections), that I have been a voter. If you can not see that, then pass.

in 2019, some of the policies they put forward, were just plain mad, bit like old labour of the early 80s(ish guess). They lost my vote on that basis, nothing really to do with tories or JC etc.

I can understand that someone leans more left, but that doesn't mean I would ever support a far left leaning labour party. I would rather vote LDems or another party or not vote at all.

I am one of those floating voters tbh. Get the impression from some people, that some think that is actually wrong and that those people are just voting looking after myself, which is not the way I vote. Policies have to make sense and be workable in the real world.

Loyalty and politics do not go hand in hand. And never understood, why someone will just follow a party/leader, just because due it being called Labour or Cons, LD or SNP, irrelevant of their policies.:unsure:

Spot on!

Some might vote for a donkey with a red rosette, others might vote for a (blue) gin swilling Colonel Blimp. Yoghurt knitters might vote for a vegan tree. Everyone has different motivators. Each party needs to try and remain close to its roots but also capture the floating voters on their periphery.

Most voters vote for what they want, even if that's just little change. It rarely makes them selfish, it just means they want something, perhaps, different from me. Their choice, no problem with it.
 
3 Answers above and not one explaining how boris was better for us.

The answer is always (currently) Labour was bad.

Now, I’m not defending how Labour fought the GE or how it needed to get rid of Corbyn, McDonnell etc, it’s just a fact that I see no one defending the tories and telling us all about their positives.
 
3 Answers above and not one explaining how boris was better for us.

The answer is always (currently) Labour was bad.

Now, I’m not defending how Labour fought the GE or how it needed to get rid of Corbyn, McDonnell etc, it’s just a fact that I see no one defending the tories and telling us all about their positives.
yep. all these people asking for middle of the road.. if thats what they wanted why didn't the vote Lib...? simple... the belived the crap sprouted by the tories and the I'm all right jack mentality now prevalant
 
Genuine question, why should the public have any loyalty to one party ?

For example labour have changed massively over the years(sometimes swinging between elections), that I have been a voter. If you can not see that, then pass.

in 2019, some of the policies they put forward, were just plain mad, bit like old labour of the early 80s(ish guess). They lost my vote on that basis, nothing really to do with tories or JC etc.

I can understand that someone leans more left, but that doesn't mean I would ever support a far left leaning labour party. I would rather vote LDems or another party or not vote at all.

I am one of those floating voters tbh. Get the impression from some people, that some think that is actually wrong and that those people are just voting looking after myself, which is not the way I vote. Policies have to make sense and be workable in the real world.

Loyalty and politics do not go hand in hand. And never understood, why someone will just follow a party/leader, just because due it being called Labour or Cons, LD or SNP, irrelevant of their policies.:unsure:
Just re-read the post and seen your question.

Where did I say they should? The fact is, some people are that loyal, put a red rosette on a do or a blue rosette on a dog and some people would still vote for them.

Many will vote differently in local to national elections.

So no one is saying the public should or shouldn’t have loyalty to one party, the fact is, some are.
 
3 Answers above and not one explaining how boris was better for us.

The answer is always (currently) Labour was bad.

Now, I’m not defending how Labour fought the GE or how it needed to get rid of Corbyn, McDonnell etc, it’s just a fact that I see no one defending the tories and telling us all about their positives.
I can't tell you that Boris is better, I can't give you Tory positives. It was the worst election I've ever experienced for the choice to make. I can only tell you what I heard over and over, from interviews on the TV, radio, friends, relatives etc. Jeremy and his policies were a worse option than boris. Boris was the least worst option of the two. That doesn't mean there were positives, just fewer negatives.

Thinking on, there was one positive, depending on your viewpoint . The Tories took a clear stance on Brexit, vote for us and they will enact the referendum. We now have a level of clarity that did not exist before, it has allowed the country to move on.

Dont ask for a second though ?
 
yep. all these people asking for middle of the road.. if thats what they wanted why didn't the vote Lib...? simple... the belived the crap sprouted by the tories and the I'm all right jack mentality now prevalant
Too many saw the LibDem stance on Brexit as anti democratic, keeping the turmoil going on for longer. They should have picked up disaffected labour voters but I think that policy scuppered them.
 
I can't tell you that Boris is better, I can't give you Tory positives. It was the worst election I've ever experienced for the choice to make. I can only tell you what I heard over and over, from interviews on the TV, radio, friends, relatives etc. Jeremy and his policies were a worse option than boris. Boris was the least worst option of the two. That doesn't mean there were positives, just fewer negatives.

Thinking on, there was one positive, depending on your viewpoint . The Tories took a clear stance on Brexit, vote for us and they will enact the referendum. We now have a level of clarity that did not exist before, it has allowed the country to move on.

Dont ask for a second though ?
Which is sort of what I said in post #182. ;)
 
Top