Fyldewhite
Tour Winner
Yesterday, our comp was a medal played over 15 holes due to a section of the course being waterlogged. The computer advised players when signing in of the shots received as well as handicap (e.g for me it said "Handicap 6, Strokes received 5").
We had a scorecard returned by a guy off 8. He had not entered his name or handicap in the box provided at the top of the scorecard. He had put 7 (i.e. the shots he should get) in the handicap box underneath the gross score and worked out his nett score correctly.
OK. We cannot apply any penalty for not entering his name as it's the committees responsibility (it was clear who's card it was from the signature btw). Also, there is no penalty for entering handicap in the wrong place on a scorecard so long as it IS recorded somewhere. So, I don't think we have any alternative than to take the 7 entered to be his handicap which would then give him only 6 shots and increase his nett score by 1. In other words he has entered a lower handicap on his card and therefore has to play off it.
This is obviously harsh but is it "harsh but fair"? Also, anyone have an alternate view or have we missed anything?
We had a scorecard returned by a guy off 8. He had not entered his name or handicap in the box provided at the top of the scorecard. He had put 7 (i.e. the shots he should get) in the handicap box underneath the gross score and worked out his nett score correctly.
OK. We cannot apply any penalty for not entering his name as it's the committees responsibility (it was clear who's card it was from the signature btw). Also, there is no penalty for entering handicap in the wrong place on a scorecard so long as it IS recorded somewhere. So, I don't think we have any alternative than to take the 7 entered to be his handicap which would then give him only 6 shots and increase his nett score by 1. In other words he has entered a lower handicap on his card and therefore has to play off it.
This is obviously harsh but is it "harsh but fair"? Also, anyone have an alternate view or have we missed anything?