Has the BBC lost its objectivity ?

Oh and they really annoyed Trump recently and he called then fake news. Which only endears them to me more. What Trump is trying to do is truly sinister by discrediting any reporting that dares to question him. That is not a democracy, that is a dictatorship.
 
People think the BBC is pro Assad? Really?

As many have said before, all sides think the BBC is biased which probably means it is about right. There are certainly aspects I don't like or agree with but I don't think it is sinister.
 
erm...you mean that Brexiteers don't like hearing reporting of potential issues and problems associated with Brexit that become ever clearer on a day-by-day basis - and the studies from 'experts' - what do they know? - that look at the impact. When there isn't as much reporting of the studies and expert analysis that shows all of the great benefits that will come about for Great Brexit once we have left.

Hmmm. Le me think. I know - could it be that nobody has any real idea of the nature and scale of the benefits that will come Great Brexit's way - and there aren't so many experts and studies out here prediction great things.

And so rather than face that fact - let's blame the BBC reporting the message instead.

So to be balanced. On Andrew Marr this morning - on the BBC - we have a balanced approach. We get a positive from Brexit and we have an issue. The issue? Status of Gibraltar. The positive? We might get a blue passport back.

If it were not so serious that would be funny. And that is what 'the people' voted for. Halle-bloody-lujah.
 
Oh and they really annoyed Trump recently and he called then fake news. Which only endears them to me more. What Trump is trying to do is truly sinister by discrediting any reporting that dares to question him. That is not a democracy, that is a dictatorship.

He called the BBC 'fake news' then two weeks later cited the BBC as a source for his 'wiretapping' claim
 
As a state broadcaster I don't think it should be compared to others; it should be impartial whereas IMO its...

Pro-left
Anti-business
Pro-Syria
Anti-Israel
Pro-Clinton
Anti-Trump
Pro-Bercow
Anti-Grammar School
Pro-celebrities
Pro-Scotland independence
Pro-Strugeon
Pro-Juncker
Anti-PM
etc...

You see - as soon as you include these two things the BBC is 'pro' you lose credibility as if you paid any attention to what goes on in Scotland you would know - as DfT has noted - that the SNP view the BBC as massively anti-indy.
 
You see - as soon as you include these two things the BBC is 'pro' you lose credibility as if you paid any attention to what goes on in Scotland you would know - as DfT has noted - that the SNP view the BBC as massively anti-indy.

Approx half of Scotland are anti-Indey, some of which are pro SNP for their socialist policies.
 
As a state broadcaster I don't think it should be compared to others; it should be impartial whereas IMO its...

Pro-left
Anti-business
Pro-Syria
Anti-Israel
Pro-Clinton
Anti-Trump
Pro-Bercow
Anti-Grammar School
Pro-celebrities
Pro-Scotland independence
Pro-Strugeon
Pro-Juncker
Anti-PM
etc...

Increasingly nowadays people seem to seek out media sources that confirm their own bias and rage against those that differ.

A bit sad really but I think the fact that both sides on almost any major issue tend to complain about the BBC suggests they're probably keeping a decent balance.
 
Approx half of Scotland are anti-Indey, some of which are pro SNP for their socialist policies.

The SNP consider the BBC anti-Indy - not Pro-Indy as drdel says

Also I'll note that quite a lot of the SNP voters who voted to leave the EU did so - not because of any great dislike of the EU - but because they saw Brexit as a way of hastening IndyRef2. And so it will most probably come to pass. And if those SNP Brexiteers find Sturgeon trying to get an Indy Scot into the EU, I suggest that they will not complain.
 
Last edited:
Exactly my viewpoint. If your feelings are particularly strong one way or the other, then you will object to any reporting that does not agree with your view.
No service is perfect but I do believe the BBC does its best to be balanced and objective in its approach.
This is an interesting article that relates to individuals view of the new....
How do you tell when the news is biased? It depends on how you see yourself

When they continue to report known lies as facts.

Nicola and the French ambassador being the obvious one.
The picture of the EU immigrant/asylum seekers queue another.
 
erm...you mean that Brexiteers don't like hearing reporting of potential issues and problems associated with Brexit that become ever clearer on a day-by-day basis - and the studies from 'experts' - what do they know? - that look at the impact. When there isn't as much reporting of the studies and expert analysis that shows all of the great benefits that will come about for Great Brexit once we have left.

Hmmm. Le me think. I know - could it be that nobody has any real idea of the nature and scale of the benefits that will come Great Brexit's way - and there aren't so many experts and studies out here prediction great things.

And so rather than face that fact - let's blame the BBC reporting the message instead.

So to be balanced. On Andrew Marr this morning - on the BBC - we have a balanced approach. We get a positive from Brexit and we have an issue. The issue? Status of Gibraltar. The positive? We might get a blue passport back.

If it were not so serious that would be funny. And that is what 'the people' voted for. Halle-bloody-lujah.
Give us a break mate. You are flaming paranoid about Brexit to the point now that you are making yourself out to be the Forum Oddball. Please do yourself and the rest of us a favor and change the record.
 
Increasingly nowadays people seem to seek out media sources that confirm their own bias and rage against those that differ.

A bit sad really but I think the fact that both sides on almost any major issue tend to complain about the BBC suggests they're probably keeping a decent balance.
Which is what Delc said
 
I'm interested in how you think it would be more neutral. If it has to bring in advertising to pay its way then it would sell its supposed neutrality to the highest bidder. It would become dependant on big business to survive.
Under the current system they get their money come what may. If they had to rely on subscribers they would have to be more neutral.
No-one seems to have too much trouble with Sky News.
 
I don't think they're that different from any media outlet. They report the news, and then express an opinion of the news. Whether its the Telegraph, Mail, Mirror or the Times its about reading the news and deciphering the opinion.

Occasionally they're clumsy and shallow but I don't have a problem with them expressing an opinion, which I can either agree or disagree with.
The media outlets you have highlighted are all newspapers. You know what you are buying and printed news has traditionally been this way. TV news had traditionally been neutral in this country and the state broadcaster which we all have to pay for has a duty to be neutral, especially in the U.K.
 
erm...you mean that Brexiteers don't like hearing reporting of potential issues and problems associated with Brexit .
The fact that you have come out in favour of the BBC confirms beyond doubt anyone's suspicions that they may be a little biased in favour of remaining.
 
You seem to have a very out of touch/skewed opinion if you think the BBC is pro Sturgeon and Scottish Independence.

Re The EU referendum I thought The BBC was, and still is, very biased towards the Remainers.......IMVHO.

There is just more news about issues and possible impacts of leaving - when there is nothing about the upsides of leaving - because we don't know how we are leaving - nobody knows - what are they supposed to report. Maybe they should have a specific section on news bulletins called 'Today from Dexeu' that reports what Davis and hois Brexiteers are up to. The problem is that May has said that she will not be giving a running commentary - so what is the BBC supposed to report?
 
Top