edgey
Assistant Pro
The OP gave me permission to access his playing record.
Initial allocation revision doesn't come into it - He has been playing regularly in competitions since at least early 2012.
His 2-stroke reduction for 23 points in a 9-hole qualifier seems spot on.
I can see nothing whatsoever in his playing record which could remotely come near justifying a 3-stroke reduction, either by Annual Review or General Play.
I have advised him to have a quiet word with his Handicap Secretary for an explanation.
It has been my sad experience that the position of handicap secretary too often attracts to it the very people who should never be allowed to fill it, i.e. narcissistic meglomaniacs with delusions of omnipotence.These are the people who liveout the lack of any power they have in their own lives by imposing decisions that are often unsupported by any rules and for no other reason than they can. Decisions like this are often made based on a "nudge or a wink" or hypothesis, supposition or simple bitterness.
After you have had a quiet word with the handicap secretary I would insist on the evidence he used to justify this cut. If that evidence is insufficiently robust (and in my experience it nearly always is) I would inform him you are planning to speak to the EGU directly to raise your concerns and a possible complaint.
Last edited: