GB news .

Saw this thread and decided to have a look at it. Saw Dan Wootan's show around 10pm. The discussion was about 'US is opening up, but we are too afraid to open even though US does not have the same level of vaccination'... some interesting points. Then one of the guests said, 'the US does not have the same number of Indians as we have'. I fell over laughing and switched off. She has probably never been to the US.
I think we can blame John Wayne for driving them out.
 
GB News...will be inventing or exaggerating an issue and attaching blame for it to one of their favourite or a new bete noir; get their viewers angry and frightened about said issue - and make sure that they align support of the source and issue with one of the main political parties, ensuring that their angry and scared viewers see the other main party as being on their side. And, as for much of the press of a certain alignment, I fear that that is how it’ll go. Very sadly.

I make no comment or suggestions about which of the main political parties will mostly be involved in this game of influencing public opinion.
 
Last edited:
GB News...will be inventing or exaggerating an issue and attaching blame for it to one of their favourite or a new bete noir; get their viewers angry and frightened about said issue - and make sure that they align support of the source and issue with one of the main political parties, ensuring that their angry and scared viewers see the other main party as being on their side. And, as for much of the press of a certain alignment, I fear that that is how it’ll go. Very sadly.

I make no comment or suggestions about which of the main political parties will mostly be involved in this game of influencing public opinion.
Have you been on the wine gums ?
 
GB News...will be inventing or exaggerating an issue and attaching blame for it to one of their favourite or a new bete noir; get their viewers angry and frightened about said issue - and make sure that they align support of the source and issue with one of the main political parties, ensuring that their angry and scared viewers see the other main party as being on their side. And, as for much of the press of a certain alignment, I fear that that is how it’ll go. Very sadly.

I make no comment or suggestions about which of the main political parties will mostly be involved in this game of influencing public opinion.

James O’Brien, LBC?
 
GB News...will be inventing or exaggerating an issue and attaching blame for it to one of their favourite or a new bete noir; get their viewers angry and frightened about said issue - and make sure that they align support of the source and issue with one of the main political parties, ensuring that their angry and scared viewers see the other main party as being on their side. And, as for much of the press of a certain alignment, I fear that that is how it’ll go. Very sadly.

I make no comment or suggestions about which of the main political parties will mostly be involved in this game of influencing public opinion.

Very balanced. Was it with any actual knowledge of watching it or just a prejudiced assumption brought on by the anti propaganda prior to launch?
 
Except it has nothing to do with the definition of the term "Woke".

Depends on your definition of woke.

Woke is used to mock the hypersensitivity of the left.
And as we know the “woke” or “snowflake” or “politically correct brigade” don’t like opposing views or others subjected to opposing views in their fascist ideology.
 
Depends on your definition of woke.

Woke is used to mock the hypersensitivity of the left.
And as we know the “woke” or “snowflake” or “politically correct brigade” don’t like opposing views or others subjected to opposing views in their fascist ideology.
It's not my definition. It's the dictionary definition. However, as often happens, the term is then used out of context, or mockingly, for their own use.
Screenshot 2021-06-18 102010.jpg
 
Depends on your definition of woke.

Woke is used to mock the hypersensitivity of the left.
And as we know the “woke” or “snowflake” or “politically correct brigade” don’t like opposing views or others subjected to opposing views in their fascist ideology.

Do we have an agreed term we are allowed to use to mock the hypersensitivity of the right? Or can we just use snowflake as a common mocking term for all groups that throw a tantrum when someone doesn't agree with their veiw of the world?
 
Do we have an agreed term we are allowed to use to mock the hypersensitivity of the right? Or can we just use snowflake as a common mocking term for all groups that throw a tantrum when someone doesn't agree with their veiw of the world?

I thought the agreed term was gammon? But snowflake works, as it is now used by the left.

Weaponising words works both ways.
 
Very balanced. Was it with any actual knowledge of watching it or just a prejudiced assumption brought on by the anti propaganda prior to launch?
100% balanced as I make no prediction or assertion about who it will be rooting for and who it will be associating with supporting the issue or source.
 
I thought the agreed term was gammon? But snowflake works, as it is now used by the left.

Weaponising words works both ways.

As someone who considers themself as being slightly right of centre. I think a common term will help bring everyone together.
 
It's a pity we can't agree to accept that people have differing views without having to use derogatory terms to counter that viewpoint.
Terms like "woke", "snowflake", "liberal", "nazi", etc are now used, mainly in the wrong context or someone's own (incorrect) interpretation of that term as a weapon.
For information, I am left of centre and consider myself "woke" by the dictionary definition above, but I am also respectful of other peoples viewpoints. I would point out my side of it but would do my absolute best not to get in to name-calling to try to add emphasis to my viewpoint.
However, sensationalism seems to be the order of the day and reasoned argument seems to be sadly less prevalent.
 
It's a pity we can't agree to accept that people have differing views without having to use derogatory terms to counter that viewpoint.
Terms like "woke", "snowflake", "liberal", "nazi", etc are now used, mainly in the wrong context or someone's own (incorrect) interpretation of that term as a weapon.
For information, I am left of centre and consider myself "woke" by the dictionary definition above, but I am also respectful of other peoples viewpoints. I would point out my side of it but would do my absolute best not to get in to name-calling to try to add emphasis to my viewpoint.
However, sensationalism seems to be the order of the day and reasoned argument seems to be sadly less prevalent.
Spot on.
Not sure which side I tend towards - I've wobbled slightly in either direction over the years, depending on my view on the issues of the time, but would hope to have always been a thoughtful moderate.
I'm also proud to be English and British and dismayed that some elements feel that anyone who disagrees with their viewpoint must be unpatriotic. It would be nice if our national flag could be less of a weapon for some, after all, it represents a union, not a division.
 
100% balanced as I make no prediction or assertion about who it will be rooting for and who it will be associating with supporting the issue or source.

glad to see it was 100% balanced and not jumping ahead wiuth assumptions!! To quote your balance "GB News...will be inventing or exaggerating an issue and attaching blame for it to one of their favourite or a new bete noir"!
 
Top