Fastest finger first. Booking tee times

I'm a member at two clubs that use iG.

At one you can see "the time" on the booking page. On the other, there is no time on the booking page.

I used the inverted commas to differentiate between "server time" and what it says on your watch/phone/cuckoo clock! They could be different enough.
 
So there is a facilty to check times and whether the committee want to act on it is another matter .
It may well be a difficult conversation but one that should be had if enough members raise the issue.
As a club that prides its self on inclusion, which I heartly agree with, I'm suprised there seems an acceptance of a practice that disadvantages other members.

The ability to create some way to auto pick a tee time is available to all

Is it any different to those that have faster internet or better smart devices etc

It’s not something you can prove beyond any doubt unless you are sat at their home watching them do it
 
The ability to create some way to auto pick a tee time is available to all

Is it any different to those that have faster internet or better smart devices etc

It’s not something you can prove beyond any doubt unless you are sat at their home watching them do it
How about if their script/bot comes from an ip address that looks suspicious?
 
At my last club it had a big membership and it was a very definite fastest finger job. I got to be quite good at it. 2 seconds after the times are released? Too late. You have to time the tap. Too early, no good. Watch the clock, count the last few seconds in your head, tap the booking.

I used to go for a slightly uneven time as well. Don't go for 8.00am or an 8.30 for example. Find an ugly number around that time. Let's say 8.08 or 8.32. it's surprising how many people don't go for ugly times. Gives you more chance of getting one.
 
It’s after the has been booked which ultimately is all that matters - it’s tough to go up to someone and say , you booked within 3 seconds you must be cheating etc
No doubt it’s a tricky situation, but the evidence I sent was pretty clear. 1 slot filled with 4 names, all of the others still available. Not a chance in the world anyone can type in 4 names and confirm the booking within 3 seconds. It comes down to whether the club are bothered about it. If they are they’ll do something, if they’re not, they’ll claim it was booked after the tee sheet was opened and that’s all we’re bothered about.
 
At my last club it had a big membership and it was a very definite fastest finger job. I got to be quite good at it. 2 seconds after the times are released? Too late. You have to time the tap. Too early, no good. Watch the clock, count the last few seconds in your head, tap the booking.

I used to go for a slightly uneven time as well. Don't go for 8.00am or an 8.30 for example. Find an ugly number around that time. Let's say 8.08 or 8.32. it's surprising how many people don't go for ugly times. Gives you more chance of getting one.
Think I’ll stick to being a nomad & playing twilight golf.
This all seems like hard work to me.
 
I genuinely don’t get this thread?
People have described organised teams of people sitting at computers at 17.59.59 every night all clicking furiously to get huge blocks of daily times and not one person suggested this wasn’t fine.

But if you think a bit and get your home computer to do the same thing with a little automation (so it does it much better) it’s suddenly not OK?

They’re both attempting the same thing just in different ways. One is smarter than the other.

Sounds like characterising the fact that you did it the dumb-repetitive-hard-work-every-day way while someone else used their brain and did it better, by automating the repetitive task, as “disgraceful”. How silly. Don’t like the endless click war and getting beaten? Nothing at all stopping you from using your brain too to spend less time clicking and more time coding to achieve the same.

If a slot opens at 6pm and someone books it at 6.00.00.0000001 then they’ve stuck to the rules. Why should the committee intervene? As for “disadvantaging” other members, if you’re doing it manually you’re disadvantaging others who wanted that time but are a little slower or have a poor internet connection than you. What’s the difference?

Anyway , I like playing at quieter times and the scrum of block-booked 4-balls starting at first tee and lasting 2-3 hours, when you can play millionaire’s golf on an almost empty course in the afternoon, has always puzzled me. Same people that think playing at this time is utterly essential probably come in and complain bitterly about slow play having chosen to only play during the most congested time….
 
Our booking system is definitely “fastest finger”. One second early or one second late and you will be looking for scraps.
However, ten “fastest fingers” is much better than one. We usually get enough tee times. We’re allowed to book using our own name and then guest, guest, guest, which speeds things up and prevents name duplication. The organizer will do the draw later and advise the golf shop and all the players.
 
No doubt it’s a tricky situation, but the evidence I sent was pretty clear. 1 slot filled with 4 names, all of the others still available. Not a chance in the world anyone can type in 4 names and confirm the booking within 3 seconds. It comes down to whether the club are bothered about it. If they are they’ll do something, if they’re not, they’ll claim it was booked after the tee sheet was opened and that’s all we’re bothered about.

Ultimately what rules are they breaking ?
 
Top