Embedded ball - what would you have done?

rulefan

Tour Winner
Joined
Feb 21, 2013
Messages
14,572
Visit site
As per my other response, the problem with this is, if one club adopts the Local Rule and another with very similar ground conditions doesn't, where is the fairness in that?
In stroke play you are playing the course and only other players on the same course.
In match play, you are playing your opponent on the same course.

Similar ground conditions are irrelevant. Both courses don't have the same trees, bunkers, water, length.
 

rulefan

Tour Winner
Joined
Feb 21, 2013
Messages
14,572
Visit site
The problem with leaving this to the discretion of a committee with a perhaps slightly lax or not-quite-on-the-ball attitude is that golfers supposedly playing under the same CONGU handicap umbrella actually end up playing under completely different rules.

That is what CSS is all about. The effect of conditions on the course on the day. Some courses may have preferred lies, tee mats, fairway mats, temporary greens; others won't. All at the discretion of the committee.
Your handicap is based on CSS not SSS or par.
 

Imurg

The Grinder Of Pars (Semi Crocked)
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
36,864
Location
Aylesbury Bucks
Visit site
That is what CSS is all about. The effect of conditions on the course on the day. Some courses may have preferred lies, tee mats, fairway mats, temporary greens; others won't. All at the discretion of the committee.
Your handicap is based on CSS not SSS or par.

Unless you have players at the same club, as per the OP, potentially playing to different rules....whether it be lax communication or lack of understanding.
If the "plugged in the rough" rule was as universal as "plugged in the fairway" rule there would be no misunderstanding.
 

Foxholer

Blackballed
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
24,160
Visit site
It doesn't really satisfy the principle of 'Play the ball as it lies, play the course as you find it'.
Perhaps some people believe that problems shouldn't exist on a golf course.

True enough. But exactly the same IS part of the Rules for that sort of condition/event in the 'closely mown area'. How do you resolve that 'inconsistency'/

The alternative is to 'not play' when the course is in a condition where this is likely and that LR is not in place! Dependence on CSS to 'correct' such anomolies is lazy and daft imo!
 

JezzE

GM Staff
Moderator
Joined
Nov 1, 2006
Messages
1,249
Location
GM Towers, London
Visit site
In stroke play you are playing the course and only other players on the same course.
In match play, you are playing your opponent on the same course.

Similar ground conditions are irrelevant. Both courses don't have the same trees, bunkers, water, length.

Yes of course, although your different conditions bit is completely irrelevant to what I'm talking about.

Some clubs adopting the Local Rule while others don't mucks up the alleged equity of the CONGU scheme, doesn't it? Different clubs playing by different Rules effectively...
 

JezzE

GM Staff
Moderator
Joined
Nov 1, 2006
Messages
1,249
Location
GM Towers, London
Visit site
That is what CSS is all about. The effect of conditions on the course on the day. Some courses may have preferred lies, tee mats, fairway mats, temporary greens; others won't. All at the discretion of the committee.
Your handicap is based on CSS not SSS or par.

You're missing the point of what I'm saying, and I'm well aware of what handicaps are based on.

Not everything is as black and white in the Rules as some would have us believe...
 

rulefan

Tour Winner
Joined
Feb 21, 2013
Messages
14,572
Visit site
Yes of course, although your different conditions bit is completely irrelevant to what I'm talking about.

Some clubs adopting the Local Rule while others don't mucks up the alleged equity of the CONGU scheme, doesn't it? Different clubs playing by different Rules effectively...
Some clubs play preferred lies in the winter (a local rule), some don't. What is the difference?
 

rulefan

Tour Winner
Joined
Feb 21, 2013
Messages
14,572
Visit site
True enough. But exactly the same IS part of the Rules for that sort of condition/event in the 'closely mown area'. How do you resolve that 'inconsistency'/
So to be consistent throughout the course, should the facility be available for a ball plugged in a bunker?
 
Last edited:

Foxholer

Blackballed
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
24,160
Visit site
So to be consistent throughout the course, should the facility be available for a ball plugged in a bunker?

No! A bunker is a hazard that you (should) know about before you make your shot. The other 2 are (somewhat) unexpected conditions, only 1 of which is covered in the Rules (all year round).
 

rulefan

Tour Winner
Joined
Feb 21, 2013
Messages
14,572
Visit site
Of course fairways are inherently different to the rough. The grass is short (usually a lot shorter then the rough). Even after light rain, balls will plug in the softer soil just below the thin blanket of grass. The grass in the rough presents a significant barrier and will slow the ball down so the impact will be gentler.
If the conditions are such that the LR is justified, then fine.

In my experience the problem most encountered is mud on the ball and there is a perfectly good remedy for that. The Lift, Clean and Replace LR which applies through the green.
This avoids the argument about 'placing' on a nice tuft of grass in the rough when the ball was actually sitting down in 4" of grass.

Of course the solution is to persuade your committee that it is a good idea. The RBs have provided the choice.
At present most courses around the world only use the LR when they believe it is needed. If most used it all the time, no doubt the RBs would change rule 25-2.
 
Last edited:
Top