D
Deleted member 21258
Guest
Give the taxpayer the money or moneys worth that they have had for various things, that they still benefit from, then I wont care.
Correct, my brother in law was a class behind him at Sandhurst and was on Op Herrick with him. Had zero special priveleges as he was just another officer who had a job to do. At Sandhurst he was subjected to the same training as everyone else and I know that to get through that he would have been a tough SOB.Knowing people that worked with him and briefly seeing him in Afghan then that’s exactly what happened - he was treated the same as others - until our gutter press leaked it
90% of the time I don't care but I do when it involves tax payers money, money could go to better use elsewhere. I had a 400 mile round trip yesterday and heard a good deal about this on the radio. The general opinion is you can bea senior person in the royal family or not, you can't be a little bit in. The idea that they can spend 6 months of the year in America / Canada 'working towards financial autonomy' is not compatable with spending the remaining 6 months in the UK on Royal duties. If they want to go to Canada, by all means but accept that you become a Zara Philips (no criticism of her at all) and lose some of the priveleges that you had previously. If you want to keep the trappings then accept what goes with the job, perhaps look at someone like Anne and learn how to do it whilst keeping your head down.
They strike me at the moment as being a bit like the Beckhams at their peak. They are complaining about the press but then do things that put them absolutely at the forefront of the news.
Trying to lecture on climate change, then taking a lot of flack for the number of private jet flights they've taken which they didn't like?What is it that has been done ? Trying to recall any major issues beyond the press being the press ?
Bunkermagnet beat me to that one. They lectured, got pulled up over it, quite rightly, and then took the hump when their hypocricy was exposed. Not sure how the flying back and forth to Canada fits in with their eco message either.What is it that has been done ? Trying to recall any major issues beyond the press being the press ?
This guy wants a referendum.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-51062770
The money we spend on the royals could be used much better elsewhere, i'd not be bothered if they all stood down
Then we can have a president!
well not yours anywayIf I could get my countrymen to pick up my tabs, I wouldn't turn my back on that.
As a matter of fact, my maternal grandfather used to say that I thought I was a prince.
Don't be so sure that you want one.
Although I suppose that your president would merely be head of state and you'd still have a PM.
I think HRM Bess II is a nice lady, myself.
well not yours anyway![]()
Bunkermagnet beat me to that one. They lectured, got pulled up over it, quite rightly, and then took the hump when their hypocricy was exposed. Not sure how the flying back and forth to Canada fits in with their eco message either.
They did the documentary with Tom Bradby which put out for all to hear the issues they were both having, including within their family. No need to do that, their choice.
The current situation. Talk to the advisors of the Queen, Charles and William, who have been doing this for years, come up with a plan to withdraw from duties and then release a statement with a plan for the future. Instead they drop the news, with no plan of how this will work, with barely any consultation with the palace. They must have known the news coverage their statement would bring, they have made an absolute horlicks of it. They don't seem to want to listen to advice, to work out a method of managing their situation. If they can't see they are causing damage, did not see it coming, then they are hugely naive and I don't believe they are.
I think they are currently behaving like spoilt kids, not adults with some level of responsibility.