• We'd like to take this opportunity to wish you a Happy Holidays and a very Merry Christmas from all at Golf Monthly. Thank you for sharing your 2025 with us!

Do we really need 14 clubs?

A bit more differential between those that truly have it, and those who are very good, but one dimensional.

Personally, I don't really see a need for golf on telly every week. It's too samey.

Journey man pro, equals anyone who wins by being the best boring golfer who turns up that week. Yep, it's tough to win, and if it was me, I'd love it, but winning when the top guys aren't there is just paying the bills. You're not kidding anyone that you're any good.

It's like watching Watford play footy.

By being on the tour they are by default better than good but let's not dismiss their achievements with such disdain whilst we struggle to hit our handicap
It's quite simple for you - don't watch the golf , don't use 14 clubs , don't use a brand new driver with the best shaft in it - you have a choice
 
By being on the tour they are by default better than good but let's not dismiss their achievements with such disdain whilst we struggle to hit our handicap
It's quite simple for you - don't watch the golf , don't use 14 clubs , don't use a brand new driver with the best shaft in it - you have a choice

You are right, I do. And I don't watch much golf, it's too boring. But then as said before, if televised golf can't appeal to golfers, who the heck is going to watch it? It's competing against entertainment, so it needs to be entertaining, as opposed to formulaic.

As for having the driver with the best shaft in it, sure, but hasn't it all got a bit technical, a bit optimised, a bit computerised, and not enough to do with feel, flair, fun, talent, make something work?
If you can make it work, and someone else can't, then you've got an advantage. If you both get computer fit to the nth degree, then you are the same. Wow, that's great, but dull.
 
You are right, I do. And I don't watch much golf, it's too boring. But then as said before, if televised golf can't appeal to golfers, who the heck is going to watch it? It's competing against entertainment, so it needs to be entertaining, as opposed to formulaic.

As for having the driver with the best shaft in it, sure, but hasn't it all got a bit technical, a bit optimised, a bit computerised, and not enough to do with feel, flair, fun, talent, make something work?
If you can make it work, and someone else can't, then you've got an advantage. If you both get computer fit to the nth degree, then you are the same. Wow, that's great, but dull.

But millions of golfers do watch golf - millions do find it entertaining - I enjoy watching the European Tour - with the viewing figures still pretty good im going to guess people are still entertained by golf

I notice you have the latest Big Bertha ? I'm guessing your actions don't match your feelings ? Why not bin it and get a persimmon one ? And not two golfers are the same regardless of the club in their hand - each person's unique swing makes everyone different
 
I completely get where your coming from murph,I've dropped sky sports because it's got so boring, I wan't to see flair and shotmaking not identakit players, only Bubba really has the shot making skills these days.
I don't know if limiting the number of clubs would do this but something needs to be done

But has golf become boring because the players have changed, or has it become boring because you can watch it pretty much every day if you wanted? I've dropped Sky because I was just sick to the back teeth of watching identikit tournaments week in, week out.. If the same golF was presented once a month, I wouldn't be bored.. There is now too much golf on TV..
 
if they mixed it up a bit it would be better, links on week, matchplay the next, but as you say the same type every week, and tbh they generally show the putting all the time, be as well show adventure golf as it's more interesting. Worrying as I'm a golf nut and should lap it up
 
But has golf become boring because the players have changed, or has it become boring because you can watch it pretty much every day if you wanted? I've dropped Sky because I was just sick to the back teeth of watching identikit tournaments week in, week out.. If the same golF was presented once a month, I wouldn't be bored.. There is now too much golf on TV..
But there is not too much golf on poor people's terrestrial TV, because it's all been nicked and held to ransom by Sky Sports!
Probably Lewis Hamilton's win in BBC's Sports Personality of the Year was due to his sport being shown regularly on BBC TV, while most of Rory's great endeavours, apart from his British Open win, where hidden away on Sky TV and not seen by the general voting public!
 
But there is not too much golf on poor people's terrestrial TV, because it's all been nicked and held to ransom by Sky Sports!
Probably Lewis Hamilton's win in BBC's Sports Personality of the Year was due to his sport being shown regularly on BBC TV, while most of Rory's great endeavours, apart from his British Open win, where hidden away on Sky TV and not seen by the general voting public!


Millions watch Sky telly now - McIlroy was firmly in the public eye when he was winning

Sky sports have actually increased the amount of golf that can be watched

They haven't "nicked" or "held to ransom"

Thry have been willing to pay the money needed to broadcast the golf
 
But there is not too much golf on poor people's terrestrial TV, because it's all been nicked and held to ransom by Sky Sports!
Probably Lewis Hamilton's win in BBC's Sports Personality of the Year was due to his sport being shown regularly on BBC TV, while most of Rory's great endeavours, apart from his British Open win, where hidden away on Sky TV and not seen by the general voting public!

Yes, but not everyone is saying that Golf is now boring! I don't watch that much golf any more. I cancelled my Sky subscription as it became boring. I will watch the Majors and some of the bigger tournaments though..
 
Just came back from watching MOTD....

Thread seems to have got rather off-topic! :rolleyes:

Not really. The thread has evolved into a debate regarding why some think that golfers are "boring" and the game requires changing to encourage more flair into the pro game..

Oh, and :rolleyes: right back at ya..
 
Not really. The thread has evolved into a debate regarding why some think that golfers are "boring" and the game requires changing to encourage more flair into the pro game..

Oh, and :rolleyes: right back at ya..

As I posted....Gone off-topic! :rolleyes:

Whether we need 14 clubs --> Change the Rules to fewer than 14 clubs --> ban Lob Wedges --> Pro game is boring --> but no/little terrestrial Golf shown .... Have I missed any?

Maybe someone should change the title to 'This Week's Rant' :whistle:
 
As I posted....Gone off-topic! :rolleyes:

Whether we need 14 clubs --> Change the Rules to fewer than 14 clubs --> ban Lob Wedges --> Pro game is boring --> but no/little terrestrial Golf shown .... Have I missed any?

Maybe someone should change the title to 'This Week's Rant' :whistle:

I see you're in the mood for an argument again.. Ho hum.. Quite boring..

Happy Christmas :thup:
 
facepalm.jpg

Just when I thought it might be safe to return. Think I'll follow Grandpa Simpson's example.

Simpsons-walk-in-walk-out-whistling.gif
 
Millions watch Sky telly now - McIlroy was firmly in the public eye when he was winning

Sky sports have actually increased the amount of golf that can be watched

They haven't "nicked" or "held to ransom"

Thry have been willing to pay the money needed to broadcast the golf
But where does that money come from? Us the Sky subscribers, if we are daft enough to pay the Kings ransom demanded! I cancelled my Sky subscription years ago because I thought it was poor value for money, you get hours of adverts and talking heads, and apart from the golf and football most of the other programs were rubbish. I would rather spend my pension money on other things. :angry:
 
Last edited:
Delc you have certainly managed to go off on a cracking tangent

Again you have the choice to purchase Sky or not - millions do so it must be doing something right

Anyway back to your original point

Are you now no longer going to carry 14 clubs in your bag ?
 
But where does that money come from? Us the Sky subscribers, if we are daft enough to pay the Kings ransom demanded! I cancelled my Sky subscription years ago because I thought it was poor value for money, you get hours of adverts and talking heads, and apart from the golf and football most of the other programs were rubbish. I would rather spend my pension money on other things. :angry:

Actually, subscription money only makes up a moderate percentage of the turnover. Advertising and investment contributes far more.
The BBC would rather spend your licence money (compulsory tax to the point where most people accept it and deem terrestrial as 'free to air' where thats simply not true) on costume drama and 'celebrity' reality contests than the golf, the football or pretty much any other sport.

Sky have made more sports accessible to more than 10 million people ober a course of planned investment and promotion rather than this seemingly underhand theft tactic that seems to be being purported.

If you don't think it represents valie for money then thats fine, thats your cultural values at work. I am sure many out there wont think your golf subs represent value for money and as you pay them, I would think you would disagree.
 
Last edited:
Delc you have certainly managed to go off on a cracking tangent

Again you have the choice to purchase Sky or not - millions do so it must be doing something right

Anyway back to your original point

Are you now no longer going to carry 14 clubs in your bag ?
I never do use a full set during the Winter because I prefer to carry my golf bag, and throwing a few clubs out makes it lighter. Then I can keep my hands in my pockets between shots to keep them at least vaguely warm, and I don't have to manoeuvre a trolley around all the roped off areas. I do use more or less a full set in the Summer because:
a) I'm allowed to.
b) The trolley takes the weight.

:)
 
As I posted....Gone off-topic! :rolleyes:

Whether we need 14 clubs --> Change the Rules to fewer than 14 clubs --> ban Lob Wedges --> Pro game is boring --> but no/little terrestrial Golf shown .... Have I missed any?

Maybe someone should change the title to 'This Week's Rant' :whistle:

Er...Seems another tangent (or maybe 2) has appeared! ---> whether Sky is value for money compared to (--->) the 'compulsory tax' of the license fee that funds the Beeb!

:mmm:
 
Er...Seems another tangent (or maybe 2) has appeared! ---> whether Sky is value for money compared to (--->) the 'compulsory tax' of the license fee that funds the Beeb!

:mmm:
so? Does it really matter in the grand scheme of things? People are having a debate and no one is being abusive to anyone. Can't see the issue myself, the conversation is simply moving is all
 
Er...Seems another tangent (or maybe 2) has appeared! ---> whether Sky is value for money compared to (--->) the 'compulsory tax' of the license fee that funds the Beeb!

:mmm:

And... so goeth natural conversation. The wonder of diversion and tanget is what makes natural conversation so great. Just ask any Billy Connelly fan, 20 minutes to tell a 3 minute story.
 
Top