Foxholer
Blackballed
Seems far too sensible!Surely if that happened with one month's rain, a forward thinking politician, given the issues with global warming and climate change, would have considered what needed to be done to prevent a repetition or at least lessen the impact. What exactly has he done? No one's expecting him to control the rain, but it's not unreasonable to expect him to learn from history.
Government politicians only ever think to the next election cycle. Global Warming/Climate Change doesn't really feature, though must be addressed imo.
And the EA's plans actually seemed to have worked - within the constraints of what their Budget allowed them to.
It's just that they weren't allowed to Budget/plan for the amount of rain etc that has occurred - in certain areas particularly.
Whether that's because the politicians didn't allow them to - in an economic trough - or the Agency didn't argue strongly enough for the 'right amount of funding' is an issue for later.
The way I see the 'Rules' working, farmland is always going to be sacrificed for the needs of homes and populated areas.
Flooding in far more than 'the usual places' around me.
As for learning from history.....:rofl: